2013 (3) TMI 181

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... w John: The Appellants have provided various services to a special Economic Zone (SEZ). They have also providing output service in relation to units outside the SEZ i.e. in normal Domestic Tariff Area (DTA). They took cenvat credit on various input services like telecommunication services, cab services, courier service, chartered accountant's service etc. They filed a refund claim in terms of not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n area outside SEZ. The impugned orders worked out such apportionment on the basis of area developed under the two categories. The appellant is raising disputes about the calculations for determining these two areas. Further the appellants submit that a basis of ratio of value of output service rendered inside SEZ and that outside SEZ will be a much better and clearly determinable ratio than that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ring which such activity was carried out also is not easily determinable. On the other hand, ratio of value of services realized for output services rendered in areas inside SEZ and outside SEZ is easily determinable and does not involve the defects pointed out above for the ratio of areas. So I order that the refund may be granted adopting the ratio of value of services rendered. 8. The appellan .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X