TMI Blog2013 (6) TMI 86X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er on 26-12-2012, which has caused great prejudice to the petitioner as the Stay Application could no be argued on merit on behalf of the petitioner and the Tribunal passed ex parte order directing the petitioner to deposit ₹ 40,000,00.00 (Rupees Forty Lacs) within a period of 8 weeks. The order passed by the Tribunal being contrary to the principles of natural justice, is liable to be quash ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pellate Tribunal, (For short CESTAT ), Ahmedabad, by which the petitioner s Stay Application has been decided by the Tribunal on 26-12-2011 in absence of the authorized representative of the petitioner and order dated 6-1-2012 passed by the Tribunal, by which the Stay Application has been partly allowed and the petition has been directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 40,000,00.00 (Rupees Forty Lacs ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pear before the Tribunal and argue Stay Application. 5. In the affidavit-in-reply, this fact is not disputed that Mr. Hardik P. Shah, Chartered Accountant was out of Station on 26-12-2011. 6. In our considered opinion, the Tribunal has refused to adjourn the mater on 26-12-2012, which has caused great prejudice to the petitioner as the Stay Application could no be argued on merit on behalf of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
