TMI Blog2013 (9) TMI 928X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ht to the notice of the Tribunal earlier, the same could be adjusted by the appellant and the remaining amount could be deposited by him. He has deposited the remaining amount of ₹ 7,05,180/- on 23rd August, 2013. The impugned order was passed on 15th July, 2013 - In the application for extension of time, the appellant did not offer any explanation at all for delay or for seeking further tim ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the order of the Tribunal dated 15.4.2013. The CESTAT decided the application under Section 35F of the Act and has stayed all further proceedings on the condition that the appellant remits 50% of the service tax within eight weeks failing which stay order would stand dissolved. The compliance was required to be made by 25th June, 2013. The petitioner moved an application dated 24th June, 2013, a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... % of the liability would be Rs.21.80 lakhs approximately and that no reasons have been given to seek further time to deposit the balance of the amount. Shri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant submits that an amount of Rs.14,75,185/- stood deposited towards service tax by five challans between 13th April, 2010 to 30th August, 2011 and that interest of Rs.14,23,756/- was also deposi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... could be adjusted by the appellant and the remaining amount could be deposited by him. He has deposited the remaining amount of Rs.7,05,180/- on 23rd August, 2013. The impugned order was passed on 15th July, 2013. In the application for extension of time, the appellant did not offer any explanation at all for delay or for seeking further time in deposit. From the orders passed by the Tribunal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
