Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

PARTNERSHIP IS NOT A LEGAL ENTITY

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... PARTNERSHIP IS NOT A LEGAL ENTITY - By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN - Limited Liability Partnership - LLP - Dated:- 25-2-2013 - - Partnership firm is covered under the Partnership Act. According to the Act it is at the option of the firm to be registered or not registered. But non registered firms are not having legal protection. The liability of the partners of the firm is unlimited. The partne .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rship firm is not a legal entity as that of a company registered under the Companies Act. A company is separate from its shareholders but not the said position in partnership firm. This concept is also applicable for taxation purposes. In Tarak Nath Sen and others V. Union of India AIR 1975 Calcutta 337 , the High Court held that it is clear that although a firm in mercantile usage has .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a personality of its own, strictly in the eye of the law, it is not a legal entity like a natural person. Therefore the rights and obligations of a firm are really rights and obligations of the individual partners of the firm. In the instant case, according to the findings made by the Additional Collector of Customs in his adjudication order the partners 2 to 4 carrying on business as a partner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ship firm had contravened provisions of the Customs Act and Gold Control Rules and were liable for penalties under Section 112 of the Customs Act and under Rule 126-L (16) of the Defence of India (Gold Control) Rules. Therefore, no exception can be taken to imposition of penalties individually upon them. But since the firm is not a legal entity and Section 140 of the Customs Act was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inapplicable to the adjudication proceedings, the Additional Collector of Customs by imposing penalties also upon the firm has really twice punished the petitioners No. 1 to 4 for the same sets of acts. Therefore, although the High Court proposed to sustain the imposition of penalties under the Customs Act and the Defence of India (Gold Control) Rules, upon the petitioners 2 to 4, the penalties .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of fine imposed upon the petitioner No.4 firm should be quashed. In Vinod Kumar Gupta V. Commissioner of Central Excise 2013 (287) ELT 54 (P H) the appellant is a proprietor of M/s Asim Enterprises and partner of M/s Makhan Lal Vinod Kumar, registered dealers; the Central Excise Officers searched the business premises of M/s Asian Alloys Limited and conducted investigation. During the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... investigation it was found that M/s Asian Alloys Limited availed credit on the basis of invoiced issued by the registered dealers and washer manufacturing units. Show cause notices were issued to the appellant. The Commissioner confirmed the demand of duty along with interest and penalty of equal mount on M/s Asian Alloys Limited and on the registered dealers and washer manufacturing units and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on M/s Makhan Lal Vinod Kumar. Penalty of Rs.50,00,000 was also imposed on the appellant being proprietor of M/s Asim Enterprises and partner of M/s Makhan Lal Vinod Kumar. The imposition of penalty on M/s Asian Alloys Limited, the proprietorship firm has attained the finality and likewise the imposition of penalty on M/s Makhan Lal Vinod Kumar, of which the appellant is a partner, has also at .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tained finality. However the appellant filed appeal before the Tribunal on penalty imposed on him as partner of M/s Makhan Lal Vinod Kumar and proprietor of M/s Asim Alloys Limited. The Tribunal observed that the appellant was settling the accounts of other registered dealers/washer manufacturing units, who had supplied invoices to M/s Asian Alloys Limited without any physical movement of the go .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ods, confirmed the imposition of penalty on the appellant but reduced the penalty from Rs.50 lakhs to Rs.10 lakhs. Being aggrieved against the order of the Tribunal the appellant filed appeal before the High Court. The appellant contended before the High Court that since penalty was imposed on M/s Asim Enterprises, of which appellant is the sole proprietor, as well as on M/s Makhan Lal Vinod K .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... umar, of which appellant is the partner, therefore, no penalty can be imposed on the appellant separately, it would amount to imposition of double penalties, which is not permissible under the law. The Department contended that since appellant has actively participated in the settling of accounts of other registered dealers, who had supplied invoices to M/s Asian Alloys Limited., the proprietor .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ship firm of the appellant without any physical movement of the goods, therefore, penalty was rightly imposed on the proprietor of M/s Asim Enterprises and partner of M/s Makhan Lal Vinod Kumar and no interference is called therein. The High Court was of the considered opinion that proprietorship firm or proprietor thereof cannot be treated as two different legal entities. Partnership firm is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a firm in mercantile usage, however, penalty imposed on the proprietorship or partnership firms would mean penalty on the proprietor or partners thereof, therefore, imposition of penalties one on the proprietorship firm and second on the proprietor would amount to imposition of penalty twice, which cannot be sustained in the eyes of law. - - Scholarly articles for knowledge sharing authors expe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rts professionals Tax Management India - taxmanagementindia - taxmanagement - taxmanagementindia.com - TMI - TaxTMI - TMITax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates