Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1996 (6) TMI 312

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... itioner seeks a writ of mandamus for a declaration that the action of the respondent in collecting the compounding fees of Rs. 4,000 and penalty of Rs. 30,600, is illegal and arbitrary and for a consequential direction to refund the said amounts. The petitioner is a dealer registered under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short, "the Act"). He is carrying on the business of man .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s approached the court for the writ indicated above. This writ petition was filed on June 3, 1992. But, on August 17, 1993 notice before admission was ordered. Till today, no counter-affidavit is filed by the respondent. Sri Raji Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that though the petitioner seeks relief of refund of both the compounding fees as well as penalty the submission .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... particulars and shall make such enquiry as he considers necessary." From a perusal of the provision extracted above, it is evident that before issuing any direction for the payment of any penalty under sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) of section 14 of the Act, the assessing authority is bound to give the dealer a reasonable opportunity to explain the omission to disclose the turnover or to furnish c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion 14 affords a defence to a dealer in a case where the failure to comply with the requirements of the abovesaid provision is due to bona fide mistake on the part of the dealer in which case the dealer cannot be made to pay the penalty. In view of the above position in law, it is incumbent on the assessing authority to issue notice because the question of the nature of the failure to comply with .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ve no option but to declare that the collection of penalty of Rs. 30,600 from the petitioner by the respondent is illegal and arbitrary and issue direction to the respondent to refund the same. A writ shall be issued accordingly. We make it clear that this order of ours will not preclude the authority from taking steps to collect penalty in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates