TMI Blog2008 (10) TMI 599X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , non-communication of entries in the ACR of a public servant whether he is in civil, judicial, police or any other service (other than the armed forces), it has civil consequences because it may affect his chances for promotion or get other benefits. Hence, such non-communication would be arbitrary and as such violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. - However, appellant is not entitled to an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order. No costs. ORDER 1) Leave granted. 2) The appellant was Post Master General during the relevant period and was eligible to be promoted to the Higher Administrative Grade of Indian Postal Service Group-A and to be posted as Chief Post Master General. His claim for promotion was considered by the D.P.C. on 15.12.1999 and again on 28.02.2001 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r contended that throughout the period he was given entry of good . The respondent-Department alleged that the appellant was not considered for promotion as he was not having the benchmark of very good . According to the appellant, the adverse entries namely good were not communicated. The said aspect ought not to have been considered while considering his promotion. In support of the above cl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is required for being considered for promotion admittedly the entry of good was not communicated to the appellant. The entry of 'good' should have been communicated to him as he was having very good in the previous year. In those circumstances, in our opinion, non-communication of entries in the ACR of a public servant whether he is in civil, judicial, police or any other service (other than t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t also be deemed to have been given promotion from 28.08.2000. Since the appellant had retired from service, we make it clear that he is not entitled to any pay or allowances for the period for which he had not worked in the Higher Administrative Grade Group-A, but his retrospective promotion from 28.08.2000 shall be considered for the benefit of re-fixation of his pension and other retrial benefi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
