TMI Blog2013 (11) TMI 1164X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eniable at this stage when adjudication finding shows that appellant failed to quantify use of common input in manufacture of dutiable goods and exempted goods – Following Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Chandan Nagar Versus Dunlop India Limited And Other [1984 (11) TMI 63 - SUPREME Court ] - the appellant is directed to make deposit of Rupees Forty lakhs as pre-deposit – upon such submissi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to produce the break up of the figure relating to use of common input in manufacture of dutiable and exempted goods for consideration, appellant prefers to seek adjournment causing prejudice to Revenue. 3. The adjournment application shows that the concerned officer is suddenly unwell. When learned advocate is engaged in this case there is no scope to grant adjournment for the illness of concern ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e of dutiable goods and exempted goods. Accordingly the appellant is directed to make deposit of Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty lakhs only) within 4 weeks of receipt of this order following the ratio laid down by apex court in the case of Dunlop India Ltd. and others [1985 (19) E.L.T. 22 (S.C)] to safeguard interest of the Revenue and make compliance on 24.07.2013. (Pronounced and dictated in open ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
