2013 (11) TMI 1164

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appellant but there is an adjournment application. Stay application is pending from 21.05.2012 and that is one year old. 2. Learned counsel appearing on 27.05.2013 was specifically put to notice to provide the break up of the common inputs as per contents in para 37 of the adjudication order (Ref: page 44 of the appeal folder and page 25 of the order-in-original). Appellant following dilatory .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the court but not to bring a proceeding to halt. 4. In view of the above it is not possible for Tribunal to keep the matter pending and to grant adjournment after adjournment. Therefore rejecting the application for adjournment the matter was taken up for hearing. Revenue pointed out that there was abuse of CENVAT credit. Prima facie , it appears that such abuse is undeniable at this stage when .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X