TMI Blog2013 (12) TMI 290X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nnot pursue the appeals. Prior to 17-2-2011, such appellants were bound to obtain clearance from the COD as per the judgments recalled by the ECIL judgment - Decided against Revenue. - C/270/2006 - 274/2011 - Dated:- 6-4-2011 - Shri M.V. Ravindran and P. Karthikeyan, JJ. Shri Ganesh Haavanur, SDR, for the Appellant. Smt. Komala Choudhury, Consultant, for the Respondent. ORDER Thi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 011 passed by the Constitution Bench of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Electronics Corporation of India Ltd. v. Union of India and Others reported in 2011 (265) E.L.T. 11 (S.C.) = 2011 (21) S.T.R. 593 (S.C.). Vide this judgment, their Lordships had recalled the directions given by that Court in its various orders as reported below :- (i) 1995 Suppl. (4) SCC 541 = 1992 (61) E.L.T. 3 ( ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... uctions of the Board are being followed by the field officers. 5. We have perused the judgment and the Circular cited by the learned Consultant for the respondents. We find that in cases involving Central PSUs where the COD had declined permission prior to 17-2-2011, when the Apex Court pronounced its judgment in the case of ECIL (supra), either party cannot pursue the appeals. Prior to 17-2-201 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
