2014 (2) TMI 141

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2012. We have checked the cause list as also proceedings recorded in the file which show that stay petition was heard on 26.7.2012 and decided on that date. Accordingly, the date of hearing is corrected as 26.7.2012 instead of 24.7.2012 as recorded in the stay order. Further, since the order was dictated and pronounced on 26.7.2012, the stay order number itself is revised as 656-657/12 dt. 26.7.12 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... es . 3. The applicant submits that the demand was made, in fact, under Business Support Service and not under Business Auxiliary Service . Their appeal also mentions that the demand is under Business Support Service . However, in the order this mistake has crept in. They request that this mistake may be corrected. 4. We have scrutinized the records. It is seen that the demand is confirmed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X