2014 (4) TMI 56

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Akil Kureshi) 1. The petitioner has challenged an order dated 24.10.2013 passed by the CESTAT as well as further order dated 7.1.2014 on application for rectification filed by the petitioner. 2. The issue pertains to condition of predeposit. The petitioner is the appellant before the tribunal challenging the order passed by the Commissioner confirming sizeable amounts of duty, interest and pen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a sum of Rs.45 lakhs. Tribunal further required two other entities to deposit Rs. 1 lakh and Rs. 50,000/respectively. In case of rest of the appellants, predeposit was completely waived. 3. The petitioner thereupon preferred an application for rectification which came to be dismissed. Hence this petition. 4. From the impugned order of the tribunal dated 24.10.2013, we notice that no reasons are .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X