9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (4) TMI 130X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Respondent : Mr. Sukhdev Sharma, Advocate ORDER Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short "the Act") against the order dated 21.10.2013 (Annexure A-7) passed by the Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") claiming the following substantial ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nto an agreement with the labour contractor from time to time for labour and cartage work. As per the agreement, the contractor would be responsible for arranging labour and carts for handling and transportation of foodgrains and would make arrangement for loading and unloading of railway wagons. During the audit of the assessee, it was found that the assessee was letting out godowns on rent and n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... judicated liability of service tax along with the proportionate interest on the said amount. Hence, the present appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in terms of order dated 12.12.2013 passed by this Court, a sum of Rs. 1 crore was deposited. He argued that the Tribunal be directed to hear the appeal without further deposit. 4. Learned counsel for the revenue opposed the pr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
