TMI Blog2012 (3) TMI 366X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r: Mr. M.V. Ravindran; This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order-in-appeal No.RS/262/SRT-II/06, dt.21.09.06. 2. Respondent is absent but by his communication dated 07.1.12 requested for disposal of the appeal on the merits and the cross objections filed. 3. Heard the ld. SDR and perused the records. 4. The issue involved in this case is regarding the excise duty liability on the mo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... terpreted to be removal of goods at NIL rate of duty or exempted fully from duty 5. It can be seen from the above reproduced findings that first appellate authority had relied upon the order in the respondent's own case passed by his office. In the last hearing, the Bench had directed the ld. SDR to find out whether the said order has been appealed or accepted. Ld. SDR produces the copy of the le ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|