TMI Blog2014 (8) TMI 269X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Appeal is liable to be dismissed. Consequently the Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 - Decided against assessee. - ST.459/2011 - FO/A/75378/2014 - Dated:- 16-6-2014 - D M Misra And I P Lal, JJ. For the Appellant : Shri Akash Sharma, CS For the Respondent : Shri A K Biswas, Supdt., AR PER : D M Misra Vide o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2. The Ld.A.R. for the Revenue vehemently argues that in absence of a stay order by a higher forum against order dated 10.02.2014, the Applicant since not deposited the amount even after passing of the Honble High Courts order dated 23.04.2014 the Appeal be dismissed in view of Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. 3. We find that the Applicant had failed to deposit the directed amount w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
