TMI Blog1981 (1) TMI 257X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gainst Collector of Central Excise, Meerut s order conveyed by the Superintendent of Central Excise, Meerut vide his letter C. No. CPL/SARU/TI 68/MOR II/75/l181, dated 9-10-1979. 2. The issue involved is the interpretation of Notification No. 119/75-CE, dated 30-4-1975 under which exemption of duty was granted for goods falling under T.I. 68 manufactured on job basis by a manufacturer, limiting ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was extending to them the benefit of this Notification, but in the meanwhile G.O.I. in a different case in its order-in-revision had held that the benefit of Notification would be available to only those manufacturers where an article intended to undergo some manufacturing process is supplied to the job worker and he returns the same article after completing the required process. But when certai ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fore, the Board feels that this matter may be decided on merits by the Board by treating the Superintendent s letter as an order of the Collector, conveyed through the Superintendent. 7. Shri D.R. Gupta, Authorised Counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant at a hearing granted by the Board to them at New Delhi on 22-1-1981. 8. In reiterating the points set out in the written memorandum of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
