TMI Blog2010 (3) TMI 1047X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... imposing penalty, raising many a ground including that no proper opportunity of hearing was obtained and for wrongly holding that no objections were submitted from the part of the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on March 10, 2008 notice imposing penalty was issued, in response to which, objection was submitted on March 27, 2008, when another notice was issued ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on the turnover of the medicines and intra occular lenses . 4. In response to the notice imposing penalty; the petitioner filed an application on December 31, 2009 and requested to grant 10 days' time to submit objections. It is further stated in para 3 of the statement that the request was granted and the case was adjourned to January 12, 2010 and this was acknowledged by the representa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... petitioner had approached this court by filing W.P. (C) No. 4476 of 2009, where interference was declined. Thereafter, another Writ Petition was filed as W.P. (C) No. 7604 of 2009, and the coercive steps were intercepted for the time being. Later, the appellate authority, as per the order dated August 24, 2009, dismissed the appeals filed by the petitioner, when the petitioner approached this cour ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
