9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (8) TMI 334X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... DER By consent of counsel for both sides, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage. 2. The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition to quash the goods detention notice issued by the respondents on 18.4.2014. 3. The petitioner is a registered dealer under TNVAT Act, 2006 and also under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The petitioner Firm is engaged in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... required under the Act and, therefore, the respondents ought not to have detained the goods. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent ought to have taken into consideration that the payment of tax under CST falls within the ambit of the appropriate state i.e. Tamil Nadu. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
