TMI Blog2014 (9) TMI 812X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aside and the matter can be remitted back to the respondent to decide the matter afresh. Decided in favour of assessee. - W.P. No. 17624 of 2014, M.P.No. 1 of 2014 - - - Dated:- 4-7-2014 - B Rajendran, J. For the Appellant : Mr. V Sundareswaran For the Respondent : Mr. A R Jayaprathap Government Advocate (Taxes) JUDGEMENT:- The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Pet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... figure arrived at for six years at ₹ 4,96,67,525/-. According to the petitioner, when the respondent had already determined the amount of total sales for each of the assessment years from 2007-08 to 2011-12 by way of assessment orders separately, now, it is not open to reckon the very same sales turnover for the year 2012-13. The petitioner due to personal difficulty has not filed objections ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... passed the regular assessment under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. He would further submit that the petitioner has got every right to file the objection, but, he has not filed the same and hence, the impugned order came to be passed, which is not violative of principles of natural justice. 5.Heard both sides. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for fi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
