2014 (10) TMI 342

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on the subject of implication of an explanation appearing as a substantive provision in statute book in the case of UOI v. Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd. - [2009 (5) TMI 1 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA]. It has been held that by an explanation, a substantive law may also be introduced and if such law is introduced, it will have no retrospective effect. Tribunal at the stage of stay hearing holds good an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... charging provision introduced with effect from 15-5-2008. Pre-deposit was waived to hear the appeal. 2. The period covered by adjudication was 1-7-2003 to 15-11-2003. Tribunal has advantage of reading the law laid down by Apex Court on the subject of implication of an explanation appearing as a substantive provision in statute book in the case of UOI v. Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd. - 2009 (14) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X