Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1983 (11) TMI 293

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Water-pigment finishes for leather (for brevity s sake to be called hereafter as W.P. finishes). Based on scrutiny of the private records of the appellants such as challans, delivery notes, Cash memos, private gate-passes, bills and outward challan registers, the Department charged the appellant with having removed, without accountal in the statutory record, without payment of duty and in a manner otherwise than as provided in the Central Excise Rules and in contravention of Rules 9(1), 52A, 53 and 226 of the Central Excise Rules (hereinafter to be referred to as the Rules), 2,81,656.884 Kg. of W.P. finishes during the period 1-10-1960 - 19-1-1968. By a show cause notice issued on 17-7-1968, the appellants were asked to show cause why: .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... excise control in 1955 when excise duty was first imposed on, among other things, W.P. finishes for leather. (ii) During the entire period, relevant to the present matter, the factory worked under the system of physical excise control. Under this system, goods could be cleared only on assessment of the goods by the Central Excise Officer and after payment of duty, on gate passes countersigned by the officer. There was, therefore, no question of any clandestine removals since the factory was under continuous supervision by Central Excise Officers. The Department had not come across a single instance of clandestine removal of goods from the factory. (iii) The figures have been wrongly worked out by the Department. There has been double .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .e. before the issue of the present demand notice) when a period of 6 months was prescribed in Rule 10 for issue of demand notice. (vii) The demand notice contains assumptions and presumptions, e.g. doubling the production of October 1960-March 1961 for arriving at the production of the financial year 1960-61 in the absence of the records for April to September, 1960. Reliance was placed on E.L.T. 1978 (J 152) - Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Union of India. (viii) In the above circumstances, the demands and the penalty should be set aside. 4. Shri A.K. Jain, the learned Departmental Representative, contended on behalf of the Revenue, that : (i) The findings of the lower authorities were based on the private records maintained and rec .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... but only disputing the correctness of the interpretation of the entries; (ii) There could be no question of mis-statement or suppression when, under the physical control system, all goods had to be cleared on ARI forms and gate passes duly checked and countersigned by the Central Excise Inspector; (iii) Rule 10A was not in existence at the time of issue of the show cause notice; (iv) The Central Excise Inspector had misled the appellants by his erroneous interpretation of Notification No. 137/60 and, therefore, it could not be said that the appellants had cleared goods without payment of the full duty leviable with deliberate intent to evade duty. 6. We have carefully considered the submissions of both sides. The following poin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... it to a reasonable degree. It is difficult to believe that over a period of 7 years and more, the assessee could have systematically suppressed the production and cleared the unaccounted production without such violations ever having been noticed by the Central Excise staff. There is no instance on record of any of the goods allegedly produced and removed in violation of the Central Excise law having been seized by the Central Excise staff. Nor has any evidence in the shape of statements of the buyers of the goods or about payments received for such clandestine sales been brought on record. It is seen that there is an element of arbitrariness in the method of computation of the alleged clandestine clearances; the production for the financi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates