2014 (11) TMI 933

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eal) is filed by the Revenue as against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal raising the following substantial questions of law: "1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that printers and scanners are eligible for depreciation at 60% at the rates applicable to computers even though printer and scanner could be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to treat the income already filed by it. The Assessing Officer rejected the contention of the assessee and held that printing machinery are to be treated as normal machinery, entitled to depreciation at 25% and hence, the excess depreciation was disallowed. Aggrieved by the said order, the assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who allowed the appeal following th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... at the printer and scanner is used as an office equipment in business and that is part and parcel of the computer system as decided by the Tribunal in all the subsequent assessment years viz., 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) as well as the Tribunal have consistently taken the view that the printer and scanner should be treated as an integral part of the syste .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X