2014 (12) TMI 706

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: Anil Choudhary: This appeal is filed by the appellant against Order-in-Appeal No. SR/212/NGP/2011 dated 20.1.2011 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Nagpur. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a distributor for BSNL Pre-paid Cellular services etc. and was registered with Service Tax department under the category of 'franch .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... /-. The Assistant Commissioner while adjudicating the claim of refund, allowed refund of Rs. 23,76,070/- (Rs.18,98,953/- being Service Tax and Rs. 4,77,117/- towards interest) observing that as per the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), the amount of Service Tax on the alleged value of Service Tax comes to Rs. 18,98,953/- and the interest on such tax comes to Rs. 5,74,637/- whereas on scrutiny o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e and there is miscarriage of justice in rejecting the refund of an amount of Rs. 97,520/- out of the total claim on the account of mismatch. Accordingly, the appellant prays for allowing the appeal with a direction to the concerned authority to refund the rejected amount of Rs. 97,520/-. 5. The learned AR appearing for the Revenue relies on the impugned order. 6. Having considered the rival con .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X