Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2011 (9) TMI 906

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ut C forms were defective. In the C form, the purchase order was not mentioned. It is submitted that the petitioner be permitted to file afresh correct C forms duly issued by the competent authority. It is submitted that to rectify the error in C form, the petitioner be allowed an opportunity to file fresh C form. He has placed a reliance to an apex court judgment in State of H.P. v. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. [2005] 142 STC 1 (SC); [2005] 7 STJ 565 (SC); [2005] 6 SCC 499, in support of his contention. The learned counsel appearing for the State fairly submitted that on facts, the petitioner can be extended benefit of the judgment of State of H.P. v. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. [2005] 142 STC 1 (SC); [2005] 7 STJ 565 (SC); [2005] 6 SCC .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed that the assessee was prevented by reasonable and sufficient cause which disenabled him to file the forms in time, it can be accepted. It can also be accepted as additional evidence in support of the claim for deduction. In the instant case, respondent No. 1-company made a specific request before the revisional authority which was turned down. Therefore, the question of any non-compliance with the relevant statutes does not arise. It was noted by this court in Sahney Steel and Press Works Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer [1985] 60 STC 301 (SC); [1985] 4 SCC 173 that even in a given case, an assessee can be given an opportunity to collect declaration forms and furnish them to the assessing authority if the challenge of the assessee to taxab .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... up to December 31, 1995 and absence of any order on the same has not been disputed. Let the concerned authority deal with the application within a period of 6 weeks after giving notice to respondent No. 1-company. The revisional authority shall take note of the order to be passed thereon. In view of the law laid down by the apex court, we find that the petitioner is entitled for an opportunity to produce due C form before the revisional authority within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, and if an application is filed by the petitioner along with due C forms, the revisional authority shall restore the file of Revision Case No. 92/Bhopal/10-11 Central, to its number and re-decide the matter in accordance .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates