Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2012 (8) TMI 884

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s a vocational educational institute and is providing vocational education which is job-oriented. The institute is duly registered under the Service Tax Act, 1994. The petitioner-company states that it does not carry on business of purchase and sale of goods, and consequently has not opted for registration under the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter "the 2003 Act"). The business of the petitioner-company is instead stated to be of appointing franchises in Rajasthan and across India charging a specific amount as franchise fee and royalty for service rendered not only for the use of its name and services but also for providing faculty, retraining of faculty, online registration and examination, staff training, certification and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in object of the petitioner was to provide technical education for which it was entering into written agreements with its affiliates for a specified period and in turn charging franchise fee and royalty, and that there was no tangible purchase and sale of goods. Only services were being provided for which the petitioner was paying service tax to the Central Excise and Customs Department. It was submitted that the petitioner-company could not be made liable for both service tax and value added tax on the same transaction. However not satisfied with the reply filed by the petitioner-company, the Commercial Taxes Officer, Anti Evasion Zone I, Jaipur, passed an assessment order dated April 18, 2012 under sections 25, 55, and 61 of the 2003 Act .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Customs Department. It was submitted that the Commercial Tax Officer, Anti Evasion Zone I, Jaipur, had no authority in law to split the receipts from a composite business transaction by the petitioner-company into two parts, i.e., sale and service in view of the judgment of the honourable Supreme Court in case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Union of India [2006] 3 VST 95 (SC); [2006] 145 STC 91 (SC), and the judgment of the Delhi High Court in case of Commissioner, VAT, Trade and Taxes Department v. International Travel House Ltd. [2009] 25 VST 653 (Delhi). It is stated that since the effective control and possession of the alleged goods made liable to tax by the Commercial Tax Officer always remained with the petitioner-company, there wa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Achintya Kaushik appearing on behalf of Mr. R.B. Mathur, counsel for the Department, would submit that the transaction between the petitioner-company and its affiliates is capable of being bifurcated into sale and service. He submits that in this view of the matter the petitioner-company is liable to pay tax in respect of its transactions in issue. It is submitted that consequently the appellate authority has rightly rejected the stay application relating to tax and interest. The contention of Mr. Kaushik that the transaction of the petitionercompany with its affiliates could be bifurcated between sale and service is not the reasoning adopted by the assessing officer and the appellate authority or the Tax Board. Consequently I find no for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the merits of the petitioner's case, the unexceptional rule of uniformity of orders in similar cases springs to the aid of the petitioner herein. In view of submission of learned counsel for the parties, I would dispose of the writ petitions setting aside the order dated August 7, 2012, passed by the Tax Board, and directing the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) I, Commercial Taxes, Jaipur, to decide the appeals filed by the petitioner-company within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. During consideration of appeals by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) I, Commercial Taxes, Jaipur, the demand against the petitioner-company under the assessment orders shall not be enforced, subject to the pe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates