Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (2) TMI 785

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd other transactions. There is no dispute on the fact that overseas commission agent rendered service to both appellant's unit at Koratty and also to SEZ unit at Kakkanad. The appellants are liable to pay service tax under reverse charge only in respect of value of service of appellant unit. There is no legal provision to pay service tax on value of services pertaining to SEZ unit. Further .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f predeposit of tax of ₹ 3,07,965/- along with interest and penalty. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the adjudicating authority has confirmed the demand of duty ₹ 3,07,965/- being irregular availment of service tax credit and also imposed penalty of 50% of tax which has been upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). Appellants are as a LTU having two units, one at Koratty, Trich .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ligible to distribute credit as service tax credit distributor to other units. He also submits that even if SEZ unit paid service tax they are eligible for refund. As there is revenue-neutral, there is no loss of Revenue. He relied on following decisions :- (i) V.G.Steel Industry Vs CCE 2011 (271) ELT 508 (P H) (ii) Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. Vs CCE Tirunelveli 2012 (25) STR 66 (Tri.-Chenn .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (Tri.-Bang.) (ii) CCE Ahmedabad Vs Cadila Healthcare Ltd. 2013 (30) STR 3 (Guj.) (iii) CCE Nagpur Vs Manikgarh Cement 2010 (20) STR 456 (Bom.) (iv) Oil Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs CCE Raigad 2013 (31) STR 214 (Tri.-Mumbai) 4. On hearing the submissions of both sides, and on perusal of records, I find that the appellants have paid service tax under reverse charge relating to comm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ated to Koratty unit. Therefore, prima facie , I find that the appellants have not made out a case for waiver of predeposit of entire dues. Accordingly, I order for predeposit of ₹ 1,53,000/- (Rupees One lakh fifty three thousand only) within a period of 4 weeks. Upon deposit of the said amount, predeposit of balance dues arising out of the impugned order shall stand waived and recovery ther .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates