Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (3) TMI 540 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

2015 (3) TMI 540 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT - TMI - Computation of deduction u/s 80HHB - CIT (Appeals) allowed the appellant's appeal by holding that when each project is different and the deduction is per project, then it would not be justified in clubbing the income of all projects for the purposes of working out the deduction available under Section 80HHB - Held that:- It is not disputed by the revenue that the issue stands concluded by the decision in Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (2015 (2) T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n Money - Held that:- Question (B) stands concluded in favour of the respondent-assessee and against the appellant-revenue by the decision of this Court in CIT Vs. Associated Cables P. Ltd. [2006 (8) TMI 135 - BOMBAY High Court] wherein held the payment of retention money in the case of contract is deferred and is contingent on satisfactory completion of contract work. The right to receive the retention money is accrued only after the obligations under the contract are fulfilled and, therefore, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e impugned order relates to the Assessment Year 198384. 2. This appeal was admitted on 31 March 2000 only on the two following substantial question of law: "(a) Whether assessee was right in computing deduction u/s 80HHB? (b) Whether assessee was entitle to deduction for Retention Money?" Re. Question (a): 3. The appellant was interalia engaged in the business of executing projects outside India as defined in Section 80HHB of the Act. The appellant was executing foreign projects i.e. t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aforesaid purpose, the appellant has placed reliance upon the decision of the Supreme Court in CIT Vs. Canara Workshops Pvt. Ltd. reported in 161 ITR 320. However the Assessing Officer clubbed income/losses of all foreign projects and restricted the benefit of deduction available under Section 80HHB of the Act. Consequently, restricting the benefits of deduction under Section 80HHB of the Act to ₹ 90.80 Lakhs as against ₹ 1 Crore claimed by the respondent. 4. In appeal, the Commissi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

making foreign project in respect of which deduction is claimed without taking into account losses from some of the other foreign projects. 5. The revenue being aggrieved by the same carried the matter in appeal to the Tribunal. By the impugned order, the Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) interalia holding that the decision of the Supreme Court in Canara Workshops Pvt. Ltd. (supra) in principle is applicable to the present facts. It interalia held for the purposes of computing the gross t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aggrieved is in appeal before us. We find that the issue arising in this question is no longer res integra. The question stands concluded by the decision of this Court in CIT Vs. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. reported in 368 ITR 733. In the above case, the following questions had been referred to this Court for its opinion: "(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee was entitled to deduct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

onnection with Section 80E is applicable with greater force in relation to the deduction under Section 80HHB of the Act although the above decision pertains to the assessment year 196667 and 196768 whereas Section 80AB has been inserted from April 1, 1981, due to which there was material change in the relevant legal provisions? (3) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the provisions of Section 80AB do not i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version