Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT Versus Ms. Arti Chadha & Ms. Puja Chadha (In their capacity as members of the HUF Known as Mohan Lal Chadha & Sons, Late Sh. Mohan Lal Chadha Karta),

Validity of the initiation of proceedings u/s 153C - whether in absence of any incriminating seized document in the case of respondents, assessment framed u/s. 153C of the I.T Act for the year under consideration, is time barred, bad in law and deserve to be quashed? - Held that:- Since the facts of the present case are identical to the facts involved in the case of M/s Tanvir Collections Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT wherin [2015 (3) TMI 345 - ITAT DELHI] wherein held that the AO did not record any satisfa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

el/2014, CO No. 371/Del/2014, CO No. 372/Del/2014, CO No. 373/Del/2014, CO No. 374/Del/2014,ITA No. 4870/Del/2014 - Dated:- 5-3-2015 - Sh. N. K. Saini And Sh. C. M. Garg JJ. For the Appellant : Sh. Kapil Goel, Adv. For the Respondent : Smt. A. Misra, CIT DR ORDER Per Bench: The appeals by the Department and the Cross-objections by the assessee are directed against the order dated 16.6.2014 for the assessment year 2003-04, separate orders each dated 17.6.2014 for the assessment years 2006-07 and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion of proceedings u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). 3. First we will deal with the Cross Objection of the assessee in CO No. 370/Del/2014. Following grounds have been raised in this appeal: 1. (a). That the Ld. AO was not justified to assume the jurisdiction u/s. 153C of the I. T. Act in this case since the proceedings were beyond the period of six years prior to the date of recording of satisfaction u/s. 153C of the I. T. Act on 01/10/2010 and the asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

153C of the I. T. Act is time barred, bad in law and deserves to be quashed. 3. That the Ld. AO was not justified to ignore the fact that the assessment proceedings for the year under appeal were not pending on the date of recording of satisfaction u/s 153C of the I. T. Act and accordingly these proceedings did not abate in proceedings u/s 153C of the I. T. Act and the assessment being time barred, bad in law deserves to be quashed. 4. That the Ld. AO was not justified to make assessment in resp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e- barring period upto 31.12.2010 without any reasonable cause. (b) That the Ld. AO was not justified to frame the assessment without issue of statutory notice u/s 143(2) of the I. T. Act and the assessment being against provisions of law may kindly be quashed. (c) That the Ld. AO was not justified to ignore the procedure to be followed for affixture of notice and the assessment framed by way of illegal affixture of notice u/s 142(1) of the I. T. Act may kindly be quashed. (d) That the Ld. AO wa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

for the year. 7. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and the provisions of law, the Ld. CIT (A)-II, has failed to appreciate that the Ld. AO was not justified to ignore the submissions of the respondents that assessment u/s. 153C of the I.T Act be restricted to assessment in respect of seized documents of incriminating nature in the case of the respondents for the year under consideration and in absence of any incriminating seized document in the case of respondents, assessment frame .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

these books/book results for the purpose of calculating the peak from the entries in the cash book and for bank book of the respondents, amounting ₹ 7,97,069/- for the relevant year under consideration. A) That on the facts and on the circumstances of the case and the provisions of law, the Ld. CIT (A)-II, has erred in sustaining the addition of ₹ 7,97,069/- as unexplained Investment/Expenditure, ignoring the fact that the same are duly reflected/entered in the books of the accounts .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

T (A)-II, did not give sufficient opportunity of being heard to the respondents. 10. That the Ld. CIT (A)-II, has erred in ignoring the remand report, explanation given, evidences, additional evidences and material placed and available on record. The same has not been properly considered and judicially interpreted and the same do not justify the additions made. The additions have been sustained with preset mind of the Ld. CIT (A)- II and her order is based on surmises, conjectures and suspicion. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts crave the right to add, amend, append, delete any or all grounds of appeal. 4. From the above grounds it would be clear that the assessee mainly challenged validity of the assessment order passed u/s 153C of the I.T. Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on account of jurisdiction. The facts related to this issue in brief are that a search operation was conducted on 20.10.2008 on Sh. B. K. Dhingra Smt. Poonam Dhingra, M/s Madhusudan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. and Sh. Inder Mohan Thapar group .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

member in the family. However, the assessment was framed u/s 153C/144 of the Act by the AO at an income of ₹ 1,04,98,770/-. 5. Being aggrieved the assessee carried the matter to the ld. CIT(A) and challenged the assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153C of the Act on the plea that it is a time-barred, the assessment proceedings for the year under consideration were not pending on the date of recording of satisfaction and hence it did not abate for the purpose of section 153C of the Act. It was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

atisfaction on the existence of incriminating documents for assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153C of the Act. However, on quantum addition, the ld. CIT(A) allowed part relief to the assessee. 6. Now the department is in appeal against the relief allowed to the assessee and the assessee had filed Cross Objection against the action of the ld. CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the AO in part and justifying the action of the AO in initiating the proceedings of section 153C of the Act. During t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

; 11 which read as under: 10. We have considered the submissions of both the parties and carefully gone through the material available on the record. It is noticed that an identical issue having similar facts was a subject matter of the adjudication by the ITAT Delhi Bench H , New Delhi in the case of M/s Tanvir Collections Pvt. Ltd., Indira Park, Palam Colony, New Delhi Vs ACIT, CC-21, New Delhi in ITA No. 2421/Del/2014 (supra), in the said case also the proceedings u/s 153C of the Act were ini .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d case the issue has been decided in favour of the assessee and the relevant discussion and findings have been given in paras 12 to 27 of the order dated 16.01.2015 which are reproduced as under: 12. Let us examine the facts of the instant case more elaborately. It is seen that some satisfaction was recorded, a copy of which is available on page 4 of the paper book, as under :- Satisfaction Note for issuing Notice u/s 153C of the I.T. Act, 1961 in the case of M/s Tanveer Collection Pvt. Ltd., RZ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to M/s Tanveer Collection Pvt. Ltd., RZ-126, West Sagar Pur, Shankar park, New Delhi. I have examined the above mentioned documents/papers and provision of section 153C is invokeable in this case. As the undersigned is also the jurisdictional AO of M/s Tanveer Collection Pvt. Ltd., RZ-126, West Sagar Pur, Shankar Park, New Delhi. This satisfaction note is recorded and is placed in the file before issuing notice u/s 153C. ACIT, Central Circle - 17, New Delhi 13. It can be seen from the assessment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e nothing to doubt that it was recorded by the AO of the assessee before taking up the assessment u/s 153C of the Act pursuant to the search conducted on Shri B.K. Dhingra, Smt. Poonam Dhingra and M/s Madhusudan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Pages 5-7 of the paper book are the copies of the reply furnished by the Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-17, New Delhi to Shri B.K. Dhingra, Smt. Poonam Dhingra and M/s Madhusudan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., under the provisions of RTI Act, 2005. The relevant pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ons searched, it is manifest that there is no satisfaction note available/recorded in respect of other entities . On a conjoint reading of the Satisfaction note and replies given by the Department to the persons searched under the RTI Act, it clearly emerges that no satisfaction was recorded by the AO in the cases of the persons searched u/s 132(1) of the Act (i.e. Shri B.K. Dhingra, Smt. Poonam Dhingra and M/s Madhusudan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.) that some books of account or documents etc. belonging .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h condition in her opinion stood satisfied, by virtue of it having been recorded by the common AO. 16. In our considered opinion, this contention advanced on behalf of the Revenue is devoid of merit. We fail to comprehend as to how the requirement of recording satisfaction by the AO of the person searched provided by the statute can be substituted with anything else. There is an underlying rationale in providing for recording of such satisfaction by the AO of the person searched. As the money, b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

son searched and to the others and thus handed over to the concerned AOs of the person searched and others for making assessment. As it is only the AO of the person searched who can reach a conclusion that some of the documents etc. do not belong to the person searched but to some other person, the legislature has provided for recording of such satisfaction by the AO of the person searched. It is not permissible under the law to require the AO of the other person to record such satisfaction by t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arched is concerned. What is relevant for this purpose is not the identity of the person assessing but his position and the capacity. When the law requires the AO of the person searched to record the necessary satisfaction, it is the AO having jurisdiction over the person searched who is obliged to record such satisfaction in the capacity of that AO and that too in the case of the person searched. The mere fact that the AO of the person searched and the assessee is the same person, does not, in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

his contention also fails. 18. At this stage, it is relevant to note that the legislature has substituted the latter part of section 153C(1) by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2014 w.e.f. 1.10.2014. The hitherto part of subsection (1) : and that Assessing Officer shall proceed against each such other person and issue notice and assess or reassess the income of the other person ………referred to in sub-section (1) of section 153A. has been substituted as under : - and that Assessing Off .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng it mandatory for the AO of the other person also to record satisfaction that the books of account or documents, etc., have a bearing on the determination of the total income of such other person before embarking upon the exercise of his assessment or reassessment. Therefore, now under the law, w.e.f. 1.10.2014 it has become obligatory not only for the AO of the person searched to record satisfaction before handing over books of account or documents, etc., to the AO of the other person , but, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the proceedings for making assessment or reassessment. 20. The ld. DR contended that recording of satisfaction by the AO of the assessee at the most can be treated as a technical mistake and hence should not eclipse the assessment. Relying on certain judgments, the ld. DR submitted that the technicalities cannot be allowed to prevail in the course of indulgence of justice. 21. We agree in principle that technicalities cannot come in the way of dispensation of justice. However, it is important to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nal, namely, ACIT vs. Inlay Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No.4200/Del/2012), etc. and DCIT vs. Aakash Arogya Mandir Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No.5437/Del/2013), etc., in which the notices and the consequential assessments u/s 153C, under identical circumstances, have been quashed. The ld. DR contended that the above referred two Tribunal orders are per incurium and should not be followed. The main reason for declaring the tribunal orders as per incurium was the nonconsideration of the judgment of the Hon ble ju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arched person and there is no requirement in section 153C(1) that the Assessing Officer should also be satisfied that such valuable articles or books of account or documents belonging to the other person must conclusively reflect or disclose any undisclosed income. We find that there is no such controversy before us as was there before the Hon ble High Court. It is not the case of the assessee before us in this ground that the documents etc. found from the persons searched did not positively ind .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be appreciated that the satisfaction that is required to be reached by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the searched person is that the valuable article or books of account or documents seized during the search belong to a person other than the searched person. There is no requirement in Section 153C(1) that the Assessing Officer should also be satisfied that such valuable articles or books of account or documents belonging to the other person must be shown to show to conclusively .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ial discipline requires a subsequent bench to the follow an earlier order of a coordinate bench on the point. It is only if the subsequent bench feels itself unable to concur with the view taken earlier that it is required to refer the case for consideration by a special bench. In our considered opinion, these two orders of the co-ordinate benches are perfectly in accordance with law. 26. Coming back to facts of the instant case, it is palpable that the AO of Shri B.K. Dhingra, Smt. Poonam Dhing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. 27. The reliance of the ld. DR on some decisions on other legal issues or merits is of no consequence in view of the lack of jurisdiction of the AO to proceed with the assessments u/s 153C of the Act. In view of our decision on the first legal issue, there is no need to espouse the other grounds taken by the assessee dealing with other legal issues or merits. 11. Since the facts of the present case are identical to the facts involved in the case of M/s Tanvir Collections Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT. So, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version