TMI Blog1962 (4) TMI 93X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the jurisdiction posses- sed by the High Court in considering the validity of an order of the Customs Authorities interpreting the provisions of the entries in the Tariff Schedule as regards the imposition of duties. The respondent imported from Australia a quantity of oats which was described in the indent, contract and shipping documents as 'standard feed-oats . The commodity imported consisted of oats in whole grain. The question raised related to the proper classification of the goods imported under the Import Trade Control Schedules current during the period July to December 1952 when the consignment reached India. The controversy centered round the point whether the feed-oats fell within item 42 or within item 32 of the Cir ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g the import, there had been a contravention of a. 19 of the Sea Customs Act read with s. 3(2) of the Import Export Control Act, 1947 and so proceeded to deal with the violation under s. 167 (8) of the Sea Customs Act. He directed the confiscation of the good sand imposed a fine of ₹ 5,000/- in lieu of confiscation, if the. respondent desired to clear the goods. An appeal filed to the Collector of Customs was rejected and thereafter the respondent moved the High Court for the issue of a writ of mandamus under s. 45 of the Specific Relief Act. In his affidavit in support of the application the respondent besides contending that oats in full-grain fell within the head fodder' under item 42, set out earlier, because (1) he had i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t, entry 32 reading grain had, in the absence of any specific entry regarding oats to be read as excluding all grains which would be fodder i.e., which were usually used as cattle or animal feed, and that as the respondent had imported the oats for use as horse-feed the proper item within which the goods imported fell was item 42-Fodder etc. In arriving at this conclusion the learned Judges referred to the answer of the Deputy Chief Controller to the query by the respondent to which we have adverted earlier, as a circumstance indicative of the doubts entertained by the departmental authorities themselves on this matter. With very great respect to the learned Judges we are unable to agree with them both as regards the function and jurisd ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed. In other words, the conclusion or decision of the Customs authorities wag rationally supportable. We consider that even if there was no specific reference to oats in entry 32, any particular species of grain cannot be excluded merely because it is capable of being used as cattle or horse feed. The word 'fodder is defined in the Oxford' dictionary as 'dried food, hay, straw etc. for stall feeding Cattle . Without resorting to , Johnson's famous definition of 'oats in his Dictionary, it is sufficient to point out that oats, though they may serve as food for horses, is also used as human food; in other words it is not by its nature or characteristic capable of serving solely as food for animal,% and incapable of u ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y no means a model of clarity. This letter is dated September 14, 1951, and it is the case of the respondent that he placed an order for the import of feed- oats because he was led to believe that for its import no licence was necessary. The contract for the purchase of the foods for import was entered into in the beginning of June, 1-952, but before that date the Deputy Chief Controller wrote a further letter to the respondent on January 1, 1952, clarifying the answer he gave in his earlier letter, and pointing out that whereas if the oats were in whole grain it would fall within item 32, but if the same was crushed, it would be fodder within item 42. The respondent however, denied having received this letter and there is no specific f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
