TMI Blog2013 (12) TMI 1448X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -General, Haryana, for the respondents. JUDGMENT The petitioner is a partnership firm and registered under the provisions of the Partnership Act, 1932. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the provisions of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short, "the HVAT Act") as well as the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (for brevity, "the CST Act"). 2. As per the averments made in the writ pet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itioner by way of present writ petition has sought that the demand of Rs. 1,64,846 vide order dated March 31, 2010 (annexure P2) and affirming orders (annexure P3) and (annexure P4), be quashed and liability of the parties be re-determined by accepting the tax invoices and forms VATC-4/forms VATD-1 available with the petitioner which were pro duced before the first appellate authority but the same ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|