Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Acb India Limited (Formerly M/s Aryan Coal Benefications (P) LTD. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

2015 (4) TMI 224 - DELHI HIGH COURT

Disallowance under Section 14A - Held that:- The AO, instead of adopting the average value of investment of which income is not part of the total income i.e. the value of tax exempt investment, chose to factor in the total investment itself. Even though the CIT(Appeals) noticed the exact value of the investment which yielded taxable income, he did not correct the error but chose to apply his own equity. Given the record that had to be done so to substitute the figure of ₹ 38,61,09,287/- wi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r. Salil Kapoor and Mr. Vikas Jain, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr. N P Sahni, sr. standing counsel MR. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat (OPEN COURT) CM No.16296/2014 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM No.16297/2014 For the reasons mentioned in the application the delay in refiling the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. ITA 615/2014 1. Admit. 2. Mr. N P Sahni, Advocate accepts notice. 3. The question of law urged on behalf of the asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

14A. While doing so, the AO applied Rule 8D by taking into consideration the total quantum of interest other than that invested, under Section 14A in terms of Rule 8D, and arrived at the said figure after multiplying it with the result of the average value of investments and over average value of assets derived by him. He thus determined the disallowance of ₹ 19,96,242/-. The CIT(Appeals) went into the record and found that the amount of investment attributable to dividend as on 31.3.2008 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stment, and at the same time noticed that the ultimate result on an application of .05% disallowance would be same. Counsel for the revenue on the other hand, submitted that given the determination of average value of investment, the AO had no choice but to apply Rule 8D(2) in view of mandate of section 14A which required him to apply the prescribed method of determining disallowance. Facts as disclosed by the AO, who expressed his opinion that the claim of the assessee for no disallowance was w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the accounts of the assessee of a previous year, is not satisfied with- (a)the correctness of the claim of expenditure made by the assessee; or (b)the claim made by the assessee that no expenditure has been incurred, in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under the Act for such previous year, he shall determine the amount of expenditure in relation to such income in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (2). (2) The expenditure in relation to income which does n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version