GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (4) TMI 388 - SUPREME COURT

2015 (4) TMI 388 - SUPREME COURT - 2015 (318) E.L.T. 615 (SC) - Demand of additional duty - Demad on Grieg fabric was demanded on the ground that the Signature Not Verified - Held that:- Court dispose of these appeals with direction to the Commissioner to decide all the laid down issues afresh after giving opportunity to both the parties to produce whatever evidence/material they want to rely upon in support of their respective contentions. As a result, the impugned order of the Tribunal and the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. ORDER The appellant herein is the manufacturer of Foundrinier Synthetic Wire Cloth and the said cloth is of a kind suitable of industrial use in paper making machine. According to the appellant it was at all times covered by sub-heading 5909.00 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. However, in the year 1992, first show cause notice i.e. on 25.9.1992 was issued by the Department for additional excise duty for the period September 198 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

003. Thus the total period covered is September 1987 to March 2003 except February 1996 to December 1999. The first show cause notice dated 25.9.1992 led to the passing of an Order-in-Original dated 10.2.2001 confirming the demand of additional duty proposed in the show cause notice and also a penalty of ₹ 72.73 lakhs. Similar order was passed in respect of other 17 show cause notices though it was one consolidated order. Against both the orders the appellant herein preferred appeals. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

earing the learned counsel for the parties for some time, we find that though remand order is confined to certain aspects and particularly on the question as to whether the intermediary product was marketable or not, we are of the opinion that other issues raised by the respondent also need to be adjudicated afresh by the Commissioner while deciding the said aspect. For the sake of clarity we may point out that following issues are raised by the appellant in these appeals: (1) Jurisdictional iss .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 IT

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version