Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Sri Agency Versus The Commercial Tax Officer

2015 (4) TMI 861 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

Detention of goods - documents accompanying the goods are found to be defective - Held that:- Court has considered similar issue in [2015 (4) TMI 537 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] and [2015 (4) TMI 536 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] and passed an order directing the re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d on such payment, the respondent is directed to release the goods and the petitioner is at liberty to work out its remedy with regard to compounding fee before the Appellate Authority - Decided conditionally in favour of assessee. - W.P.No.10186 of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dealer on the file of the Assistant Commissioner (CT), Assessment Circle-II, Thanjavur. It is engaged in the business of buying and selling cool drinks. It will purchase cool drinks from M/s.Coca-Cola Hindustan Coca-cola Beverages Private Limited, Ch .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rse of vehicular check at Vikravandi Tollgate on 02.04.2015 at 10.50 a.m. by the Roving Squad Officials of Villupuram and during verification, it was noticed that the documents accompanying the goods are found to be defective and consequently the goo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

etitioner an opportunity to compound the offence under Section 72(1)(a) of TNVAT Act 2006 and imposed tax at the rate of 14.5% which works out to ₹ 21,511/-. The compounding fee was also fixed at ₹ 43,022/- and in aggregate arrived at a f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tioner would submit that the impugned order does not refer to any failure on the part of the petitioner to pay the tax or attempt to evade tax before passing the impugned order and no personal hearing or whatsoever has been accorded to the petitioner .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version