Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (5) TMI 167 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2015 (5) TMI 167 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2015 (329) E.L.T. 522 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Rectification of mistake - Penalty u/s 11AC - Clandestine removal of goods - Held that:- Member (Judicial) has not given any contrary findings as to the confirmation of demand of ₹ 1,55,105/- in respect of clandestine clearance of Terpene by the appellant or to the imposition of penalty of equivalent amount on the appellant. The said demand has been confirmed under the first proviso to Section 11A (1) of the Central .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

udicial), it cannot be said that he has waived the penalty of equivalent amount on the appellant, which is a mandatory provision. - Rectification denied. - Application No. E/ROM/92409/15, Appeal No. E/667/09 - Misc. Order No. M/1309/2015/EB - Dated:- 13-3-2015 - P. R. Chandrasekharan, Member (T) And Mr Anil Choudhary, Member (J),JJ. For the Appellant : Mr Prakash Shah, Adv. with Shri P Paranjape, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr K M Mondal, Consultant ORDER Per: P R Chandrasekharan: 1. The applicati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ial) has disagreed with Hon'ble Member (Technical) and has held that no penalty under Section 11AC is imposable on the applicants and its directors and the 3 rd Member, Hon'ble Member (Technical) who heard the difference of opinion has also not imposed any penalty on the appellant on the alleged removal of Terpene without payment of duty. 2. We have perused the records. 3. As regards the contention that the adjudicating authority did not impose any penalty of ₹ 1,55,105/- in respec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

duty under the first proviso to Section 11A of the said Central Excise Act. In clause (viii) he has confirmed a penalty of ₹ 22,14,77,837/- under Rule 15 (2) read with Section 11AC which is the sum total of the demands confirmed of (Rs.22,13,22,732/- + ₹ 1,55,105/-) ₹ 22,14,77,837. In other words, while confirming the penalty, the adjudicating authority has taken into accounts the sum of ₹ 1,55,105/- in respect of Terpene cleared clandestinely. Therefore, the contention o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version