Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT. Versus M/s Rohilkhand Educational Charitable Trust

Accrual of Income - Advance of Fees Receipts - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- Gone through the tribunal order in assessee’s own case for A.Y. 2007 - 08 and find that the assertion of the assessee is correct. The issue involved in Ground No. 1 here was decided by the tribunal on this basis that the assessee was following cash system of accounting till A.Y. 2006 - 07 and the same was changed to mercantile system from A.Y. 2007 - 08. In that year, the tribunal approved the change in acco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as made in A.Y. 2007 - 08 by making similar observations by the A.O. and were deleted in that year by learned CIT (A) with a clear finding that simply because the name of a doctor is missing from the list submitted to DCI/MCI, salary paid cannot be disallowed. This order of learned CIT (A) in that year was confirmed by the tribunal. In the present year also, the basis of disallowance by the A.O. and deletion by CIT (A) is same. In the present year also, Learned DR of the revenue could not point .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- Decided against revenue.

Disallowance of traveling expenses - difference in payment of salary - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- Finding is given by CIT (A) that the assessee had explained before the A.O. that there is a mistake in the auditor’s report regarding figure of salary to Shri Anurag Singhal. He has also observed that it was requested by the assessee to the A.O. that necessary reconciliation be sought from the auditors. He also observed that the assessee had prod .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s that sufficient supporting are not available - Held that:- Finding is given by CIT (A) that the assessee had explained that looking to the nature of expenses, its magnitude and volume and the nature of charitable activities in which the assessee is engaged, some vouchers may not be available. Learned CIT (A) has given a categorical finding that for expenses such as Mess, Generator, Staff Welfare and travelling etc., self made vouchers are also sufficient if the volume is small of such self mad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ritable activities in which the assessee is engaged, some vouchers may not be available. Learned CIT (A) has given a categorical finding that for expenses such as Mess, Generator, Staff Welfare and travelling etc., self made vouchers are also sufficient if the volume is small of such self made vouchers. Thereafter, he deleted this addition by observing that since no claim of bogus expenditure has been found by the A.O., addition is not justified. We do not find any infirmity in the order of lear .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

disallowance by the A.O. and deletion by CIT (A) is same. In the present year also, Learned DR of the revenue could not point out any specific defect in the order of learned CIT (A) on this issue and no difference in facts could be pointed out by him - Decided against revenue.

Loss on sale of Maruti - CIT(A) deleted addition - Held that:- The same was deleted by earned CIT (A) by observing that since the loss is suffered on a business asset, the same is allowable. Learned DR of the r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stated by learned CIT (A) on page 21 of his order that for allowing depreciation, ownership and use of asset for business purpose is essential. Thereafter, he observed that none of these have been challenged by the A.O. but this is not correct because the A.O. asked for date of completion but no reply was given by the assessee. Neither before any of the authorities below nor before us, any evidence is brought on record regarding date of completion of building and putting it to use. Hence, Deprec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee and these are directed against three separate orders of Learned CIT (A) Bareilly all Dated 28.02.2014 for A.Y. 2004 - 2005 to 2005 - 2007. 2. First, we take up the appeal for A.Y. 2004 - 05 in ITA No. 343/LKW/2014. The grounds are as under:- (1) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 5,77,000/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of Advance of Fees Receipts. (2) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urred by assessee without considering needs, exigencies and reasonableness of payments, ₹ 53,850/- on account of capital expenditure debited by the assessee to profit & loss account. (4) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 1,25,707/- u/s 40A(3) without taking into consideration the real facts and documentary evidence as mentioned by the assessing officer in the assessment order. (5) That the Commissio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s in deleting the addition of ₹ 36,350/- rightly made by the assessing officer on account of loss on sale of Maruti. (8) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of ₹ 46,00,092/- rightly made by the assessing officer on account of Depreciation. (9) That the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly is erroneous in law and on facts may be cancelled and the order of the Assessing Officer may be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

R of the assessee that all these issues are covered in favour of the assessee by the tribunal order in assessee s own case for A.Y. 2007 - 08 in ITA No. 178/LKW/2013, & 339 to 341/ LKW/2012 dated 12.11.2013. He submitted a copy of this tribunal order along with written submissions. 4. We have considered the rival submissions. We find that in the written submissions, a chart is submitted pointing out relevant Para of the Tribunal Order for A.Y. 2007 - 08 in relation to each ground No. 1 to 6 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a 16 to 17, Pages 10 to 11 5 Surplus/Deficit as per Cash System 5,11,227 Para 33 to 35, Pages 25 to 27 6 Capital Expenditure u/s 40A(3) 21,480 Para 16 to 17, Pages 10 to 11 5. We have gone through the tribunal order in assessee s own case for A.Y. 2007 - 08 and find that the assertion of the assessee is correct. The issue involved in Ground No. 1 here was decided by the tribunal on this basis that the assessee was following cash system of accounting till A.Y. 2006 - 07 and the same was changed t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

egarding Ground No. 2 also, we find that similar disallowance was made in A.Y. 2007 - 08 by making similar observations by the A.O. and were deleted in that year by learned CIT (A) with a clear finding that simply because the name of a doctor is missing from the list submitted to DCI/MCI, salary paid cannot be disallowed. This order of learned CIT (A) in that year was confirmed by the tribunal. In the present year also, the basis of disallowance by the A.O. and deletion by CIT (A) is same. In th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

travelling expenses. Disallowance was made by the A.O. as there was no TDS from these payments. A clear finding is given by CIT (A) that no TDS was to be deducted in these two cases because in the first case, the income was below taxable limit and in the second case, TDS is not required to be deducted from reimbursement of expenses. This finding of learned CIT (A) could not be controverted by learned DR of the revenue. Hence, we do not find any reason to interfere in the order of learned CIT (A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uced books of account supporting this contention but no independent enquiry was made by the A.O. and no clarification was sought by the A.O. from the auditors. Thereafter, he deleted this addition by observing that since the A.O. has not brought on record any adverse evidence, addition is not justified. We do not find any infirmity in the order of learned CIT (A) on this issue. Hence, we do not find any reason to interfere in the order of learned CIT (A) on this issue. Accordingly, on this issue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r expenses such as Mess, Generator, Staff Welfare and travelling etc., self made vouchers are also sufficient if the volume is small of such self made vouchers. Thereafter, he deleted this addition by observing that since no claim of bogus expenditure has been found by the A.O., addition is not justified. We do not find any infirmity in the order of learned CIT (A) on this issue in the facts of the present case because the activities of the assessee are charitable and considering the nature and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and volume and the nature of charitable activities in which the assessee is engaged, some vouchers may not be available. Learned CIT (A) has given a categorical finding that for expenses such as Mess, Generator, Staff Welfare and travelling etc., self made vouchers are also sufficient if the volume is small of such self made vouchers. Thereafter, he deleted this addition by observing that since no claim of bogus expenditure has been found by the A.O., addition is not justified. We do not find a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed in that year by learned CIT (A). This order of learned CIT (A) in that year was confirmed by the tribunal. In the present year also, the basis of disallowance by the A.O. and deletion by CIT (A) is same. In the present year also, Learned DR of the revenue could not point out any specific defect in the order of learned CIT (A) on this issue and no difference in facts could be pointed out by him. Hence, we do not find any reason to take a contrary view in the present year. Accordingly, Ground N .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n this basis that the assessee was following cash system of accounting till A.Y. 2006 - 07 and the same was changed to mercantile system from A.Y. 2007 - 08. In that year, the tribunal approved the change in accounting system. In the present year, it is observed by the learned CIT (A) that this addition is on hypothetical basis as there is no change in accounting system in the present year. This finding of learned CIT (A) could not be controverted by the learned DR of the revenue and hence, we f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rned DR of the revenue could not point out any specific defect in the order of learned CIT (A) on this issue and no difference in facts could be pointed out by him. Hence, we do not find any reason to take a contrary view in the present year. Accordingly, Ground No. 6 is also rejected. 14. Regarding Ground No. 7, we find that this disallowance is in respect of loss on sale of Maruti Car. The same was deleted by earned CIT (A) by observing that since the loss is suffered on a business asset, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A.O. asked the assessee to furnish date of completion of building. The A.O. noted that no explanation was furnished and therefore, the A.O. disallowed the depreciation. The same was deleted by earned CIT (A) without giving a finding that the building was completed and put to use. In fact, this is stated by learned CIT (A) on page 21 of his order that for allowing depreciation, ownership and use of asset for business purpose is essential. Thereafter, he observed that none of these have been chall .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is partly allowed. 16. Now, we take up the appeal of the revenue for A.Y. 2005 - 06 in ITA No. 344/LKW/2014. The grounds are as under:- (1) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 1,77,957/- without taking into consideration the real facts and documentary evidence. The addition was rightly made by the assessing officer on account of disallowance of expenses u/s 40A(3) of I.T. Act, 1961. (2) That the Commissioner o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(4) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 8,000 on account of unexplained waive off. (5) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 35,464/- made by the assessing officer on account of Surplus/Deficit as per Cash System Accounting. (6) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of salary made without deducting TDS. (9) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 27,800/- made by the assessing officer on account of difference in payment of salary and in Form No. 16 issued by the assessee. (10) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 4,53,596/- made by the assessing officer out of Capital Expenditure incurred in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee by registered post on 08.01.2015 and these appeals and Cross Objections may be decided by considering these written submissions. In the written submissions, it is submitted by the learned AR of the assessee that all these issues are covered in favour of the assessee by the tribunal order in assessee s own case for A.Y. 2007 - 08 in ITA No. 178/LKW/2013, & 339 to 341/ LKW/2012 dated 12.11.2013. He submitted a copy of this tribunal order along with written submissions. 18. We hav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

enses 12,76,355 Para 18 to 19 & 36 to 37, Pages 11 to 12 & 27 4 Unexplained Written Off 8,000 Para 43 to 46, Pages 29 to 30 5 Surplus/Deficit as per Cash System Accounting. 35,464 Para 33 to 35, Pages 25 to 26 6 Revenue Expenses in Cash having no supporting 54,40,659 Para 47 to 48, Page 30 7 Written Off Bad Debts 82,481 8 Salary paid without TDS 2,09,703 Para 18 to 19 & 36 to 37, Pages 11 to 12 & 27 9 Difference in Salary & Form 16 27,800 Para 38 to 39, Pages 28 10 Capital Ex .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed. 21. Now, we take up the appeal of the revenue for A.Y. 2006 - 07 in ITA No. 345/LKW/2014. The grounds are as under:- (1) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 38,032/- u/s 40A(3) of I.T. Act, 1961 without taking into consideration the real facts and documentary evidence. The addition was rightly made by the assessing officer on account of disallowance of expense .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e assessing officer at ₹ 9,65,000 on account of payment of salary. (4) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 10,52,351/- on account of Salary Expenses. (5) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 3,44,804/- made by the assessing officer on account of Payments made to Doctors not reflected in DCIT and declared by the assessee a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

peals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting the disallowance of ₹ 28,68,829/- made by the assessing officer on account of expenditure in cash without vouchers. (9) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 1,89,340/- made by the assessing officer on account of capital expenses disallowed without voucher or evidence. (10) That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly has erred on facts a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM – Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version