TMI Blog2015 (5) TMI 632X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at the petitioner cannot be left without any remedy, as the petitioner states that the goods are not liable for detention or for levy of any compounding fee. The petitioner would state that there are sufficient documents to show that the transaction is not in violation of the provisions of the TNVAT Act, more particularly, when the consignor and the consignee have furnished the TIN numbers and the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 014 - T. S. Sivagnanam,JJ. For the Petitioner : Ms. P. Kavitha Balakrishnan For the Respondents : Mr. V. Haribabu ORDER By consent of the learned counsel on either side, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner in this writ petition challenges the goods detention order dated 26.11.2012. The goods, which were transported, were detained by the Check ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... am and they were moved under the cover of way bill No.151447025, mentioning the delivery address with proper lorry receipt etc. and therefore, the question of detention and the imposition of compounding fee under the provisions of Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 does not arise. 3. The first respondent has filed a counter affidavit, stating that during the course of vehicular check carried ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etitioner states that the goods are not liable for detention or for levy of any compounding fee. The petitioner would state that there are sufficient documents to show that the transaction is not in violation of the provisions of the TNVAT Act, more particularly, when the consignor and the consignee have furnished the TIN numbers and the goods were also accompanied by proper records. 5. In the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
