Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Vinyl Chemicals India Ltd. & Another Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others

2015 (6) TMI 48 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Condonation of delay - Bonafide belief - Withdrawal of appeals - Clubbing of appeals - Held that:- Contention of the petitioners that they were under bonafide belief that the appeal is still pending stands fortified from the facts narrated hereiabove and from the affidavits placed on record. It is further to be noted that though the petitioners had requested for withdrawal of appeal in part, the Appellate Authority erroneously dismissed the appeal as withdrawn in toto. By now, it is well-settled .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be corrected by him, but however not corrected by him, a prejudice cannot be permitted to be caused to a litigant who was acting bonafide - petitioners have made out a case of sufficient cause and as such, have made out a case for condonation of delay. However, the same shall be subject to costs which are quantified at ₹ 10,000 - Decided partly in favour of assessee. - Writ Petition No. 2774 of 2014 - Dated:- 28-4-2015 - B. R. Gavai And A. S. Gadkari,JJ. For the Petitioner : Mrs. Nikita R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sing the Second Appeal. 3. The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present petition, are as under :- (a) The petitioner, which is a Company duly registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, is registered under the provisions of the Bombay Sales Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Act", for short) and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Central Act" for short). (b) The present petition is concerned with the assessment year for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e the order dated 20.6.2000, all the appeals of the assess for various periods were clubbed by the Appellate Authority with the appeals for Assessment Year 1992-93 and thereby dismissed all the appeals as withdrawn. It is the contention of the petitioners that they were under an impression that the appeal is only partly disposed off and the appeal still remains pending before the first Appellate Authority insofar as the part of the claim about which no relief was granted is concerned. It is the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Smt.Badheka,the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were under bonafide impression that the appeal was only partly withdrawn and was pending in part. The learned counsel submits that one Shri Himanshu Kothari, who is consultant of the petitioners had advised the petitioners that the appeal is pending in part and as such, the petitioners were not aware that the appeal was dismissed in entirety, thereby finding it necessary to file an appeal against part of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t was found that the appeal was dismissed in entirety. It is submitted that in these circumstances, the Second Appeal and the application, as aforesaid, came to be filed. 5. Smt. Badheka learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the learned Tribunal has erred in dismissing the application for condonation of delay and, consequently, dismissing the Second Appeal. She submits that merely because there is delay of around nine years, could not have been a ground for dismissi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

art and as such, ought to have taken a liberal view. It is submitted that Mr. Kothari had also given details regarding his wife's illness who was suffering from various ailments. She further submits that the petitioners had further stated that one Mr. Mehboob Punjnani,who was an employee of the appellant and was looking after the said matter had also left the services of the appellant in or around 2005. She further submits that the learned Tribunal has also failed to take into consideration .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ubmits that the learned Tribunal has correctly applied the law and found that no case for condonation of delay is made out. The learned counsel, therefore, submits that the petition deserves to be dismissed. 7. By now, it is settled principles of law that the period of delay is not relevant for considering the application for condonation of delay. What is required to be seen is as to whether a party seeking condonation of delay has made out a "sufficient cause or not". The Apex Court i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

een that when the administrative relief order was passed on 27.1.2000, a part of the claim of the petitioner stood satisfied. As such, an application came to be filed by the petitioners on 22.2.2000. It will be relevant to refer to the following portion of the letter dated 22.2.2000 :- "(ii) In view of the above, we hereby withdraw the Point of Objection and Grounds of Appeal relating to calculation of CQB. (iii) However, the other Points of Objection and Grounds of Appeal, if any, as per o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cided all the appeals and dismissed all of them as withdrawn along with the present appeal. 10. An affidavit has been filed before the learned Tribunal by Shri Kothari who was consultant. He has stated that after the order was passed by the appellate Authority, he had approached the Appellate Authority and informed that the request made by the petitioners for withdrawal of appeal was only in part. He has stated that the learned Deputy Commissioner, who was looking after the matter at that time, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

munication for the period of almost three years and after three years in 2010, another demand was issued. It is stated that at this point of time, the petitioners realized that there was something which required immediate action and as such upon consulting a lawyer, it was decided to file Second Appeal along with an application for condonation of delay. 11. As already discussed hereinabove, the letter requesting the Appellate Authority on 22.2.2000 is only for partial withdrawal of the appeal an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r receipt of the communication dated 24.4.2007 demanding the amount for the aforesaid assessment year, a reply was immediately sent by the petitioners on 7.5.2007 to the Respondent-Authority, wherein again it was specifically stated that the appeal is still pending and the petitioner was waiting for the final hearing. On a specific query as to whether the said letter is replied to the petitioners, Smt. Helekar, the learned AGP for the Revenue, on instructions from the officer, who is present in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er a party has made out a case of sufficient cause or not. The letter requesting withdrawal categorically states withdrawal of the appeal is only for a claim in respect of which the administrative relief has been given to the petitioner. No doubt that the order disposing of the appeal states that Appeal has been withdrawn in toto. However, Shri Kothari categorically stated in his affidavit that he had brought the errors to the notice of the Appellate Authority and it assured to do so necessary c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version