Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (6) TMI 139 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

2015 (6) TMI 139 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT - TMI - Validity of special audit under Section 142(2-A) - Held that:- As on the date fixed, for examination of the account books etc. nobody on behalf of the assessee appeared before the Assessing Officer, although the case was adjourned on the request of Chartered Accountants of the assessee on an earlier occasion. What we further find is that the assessee did not deem it fit and proper to respond to the notice dated 07.12.2006 wherein complex discrepanc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee to question the order before the writ Court. Thus no good reason to interfere with the order directing special audit under Section 142(2-A) of the Income Tax Act. - Decided against assesse. - Writ Tax No. 305/2007 - Dated:- 13-4-2015 - Arun Tandon And Surya Prakash Kesarwani,JJ. For the Appellants : Dhruv Agrawal & Nikhil Agrawal For the Respondents : B J Agarwal & D Awasthi ORDER Heard Shri Dhruv Agrawal, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Nikhil Agrawal, Advocate on behalf of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f mandamus commanding the respondent officers not to proceed any further with reference to the appointment of respondent no. 4 as Special Auditor under Section 142(2-A) of the Income Tax Act. From the records of the present writ petition we find that for the Assessment Year 2004-05, return was filed by the assessee on 30.10.2004 declaring NIL income. The matter was taken up for scrutiny under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act under notice dated 19.09.2005 fixing 28.09.2005 as the date. In res .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee could be seen. With reference to the report in Form 10-B, six discrepancies had not been explained and which were complex in nature. These were recorded in the show cause notice dated 07.12.2006, calling upon the assessee to show cause as to why special audit under Section 142(2-A) of the Income Tax Act be not directed. The assessee was granted five days' time to respond to the notice. For the reasons best known to the assessee he did not respond to the said show cause notice. As a cons .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ither been brought on record nor has been under challenged in the present writ petition. We further find that on the date fixed, for examination of the account books etc. nobody on behalf of the assessee appeared before the Assessing Officer, although the case was adjourned on the request of Chartered Accountants of the assessee on an earlier occasion. What we further find is that the assessee did not deem it fit and proper to respond to the notice dated 07.12.2006 wherein complex discrepancies .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version