Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Continental Chemicals Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida

Denial of refund claim - duty on inputs used for export goods - appellant has not taken any credit in RG23 A Part II of the input received - appellant is not an independent exporter - Tribunal has remanded matter back only for the purpose to ascertain the fact, that whether the export of goods effected through U.K. Paints has been made under DEEC scheme or not, as in such a situation MODVAT Credit cannot be availed - Held that:- appellant has procured inputs on which duty has been paid and no Ce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Therefore,appellant is entitled for refund claim. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. E/121/2008-EX(SM) - Dated:- 20-4-2015 - Ashok Jindal, Member (J),J. For the Appellant : Shri P K Mittal, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri R K Mishra, DR ORDER Per: Ashok Jindal: The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order denying the refund claim. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant is a manufacturer of Detergent Powder filed refund claim under notification No. 85/87-CE dated 01. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ector (Appeals), who vide order dated 31.08.1992 remanded matter back to re-examine the matter in the light of the order passed by this Tribunal in appellant's own case vide order No. A/280-281/92 NRB dated 23.06.1992. In remand proceedings, on 21.01.1994, the Assistant Collector again rejected the refund claim on the ground that in respect of imports were made against advanced licence after April, 1990, the conditions and limitations stipulated in Para 215 (20) of the import of the Export P .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ibunal dated 23.06.1992. In remand, the Dy. Commissioner on 01.11.1999 again rejected the refund claim on the ground that goods exported by M/s U.K. Paints and appellant is not an independent exporter. The said order was again challenged before the Ld. Commissioner who also rejected the refund claim on 26.12.2001. The said order was challenged before this Tribunal and vide order 18.12.2012, this Tribunal remanded matter back to the adjudicating authority with the direction to ascertain the fact .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ner but again on 23.01.2006 rejected the refund claim on appeal the Ld. Commissioner (Appeal) on 17.07.2006 again remanded matter back to the adjudicating authority. Thereafter, on 12.02.2007 the Asstt. Commissioner again rejected the refund claim on premise that since the credit on input/raw material used by the appellant is not admissible the refund claim thereof cannot be granted, as it is only the said MODVAT credit which, if remains unutilized can be claimed as refund in terms of Rule 57 F .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

matter back to the adjudicating authority. 5. In the last order of this Tribunal vide no. A/1149/02 dated 18.12.2002 observed as under: The appellants have claimed that the Assistant Collector, while adjudicating the matter vide order dated 21.01.1994 has recorded that the Appellants has stated at the time of personal hearing that "They have neither imported any duty fee imported replenishment material from M/s U.K. Paint Industries, nor they have knowledge regarding the manner of disposal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the impugned goods manufactured and exported by the Appellants were not made out of the imported materials. It is also admitted position that M/s. UK Paint had not claimed any drawback as was certified by Customs Authorities under letter dated 01.10.1992. However, the fact to be ascertained as to whether export of the goods effected through U.K.Paint has been made under DEEC Scheme. The Revenue is claiming that in such circumstances MODVAT Credit cannot be availed of. This aspect of the mat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s per the order, this Tribunal has remanded matter back only for the purpose to ascertain the fact, that whether the export of goods effected through U.K. Paints has been made under DEEC scheme or not, as in such a situation MODVAT Credit cannot be availed. In remand proceedings both the lower authorities have not been examined the said fact. The Ld. Counsel has relied on the decisions of this Tribunal in the case of CCE, Kanpur Vs Meghdoot Pistons (P) Ltd.-2006 (201) ELT 398 (Tri. Delhi) and CC .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he above clarification of the Board that refund of MODVAT credit or Cenvat Credit (Central Excise Duty) has no relation to grant of drawback relatable to customs duties. It is also seen from the drawback dated 2001-2002 produced by the Ld. Counsel that the drawback rate under SI. No. 84.63 for Aluminium pistons/Piston Assembly is ₹ 4.00 per Kg. towards Customs duty. Thus, the benefit to the merchant-exporter was relatable only to Customs duty and not the Central Excise duty paid on inputs. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

exported under Bond under the DEEC Scheme were entitled to modvat credit in as much as export under DEEC/under para 347(1) of Hand Book of Export Procedure 1990-93 stipulated that advance licence can be granted only if the assessee, has not availed of the relief of the Credit of duty paid on material originally used in the manufacture of goods under Modvat Scheme. It was also alleged that since the assessee had taken modvat credit in respect of duty paid on indigenous material used in the expor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

alleged that for caustic soda 1ye, no duty paying document was produced and therefore, modvat credit on caustic soda 1ye was admissible." In these facts, this Tribunal observed as under: "On careful consideration of the submissions and the evidence on record, we find that inputs as well as the finished products are specidied products under Rule 57A. We also observe that requisition declaration was filed in respet of the inputs under 57 G. The only point of dispute is that the goods wer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Manpower Service provider

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer

Notification: Exempts inter-state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 09/2017-IT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 08/2017-IT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-CT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017-CT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services.

News: Tax on fuel more important for a dry state like Gujarat

Highlight: For an ayurvedic medicine to be classified under Chapter 30 has to pass the test whether it is for cure of any disease. If the same is only meant for care, then such product would not fall under medicament.

Highlight: Demand of interest - the period of limitation that applies to a claim for the principal amount should also apply to the claim of interest thereon.

Highlight: Government issues new notifications under CGST, IGST and UTGST to grant fresh exemptions in respect of certain supplies.

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017

Forum: Construction of single unit bungalow

Article: SIMPLIFIED E-WAY BILL UNDER GST

Article: SERVICES UNDER REVERSE CHARGE UNDER GST REGIME

Highlight: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. reg. - Circular

Highlight: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20 - Public Notice

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Circular: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20

Notification: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version