GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (6) TMI 207 - ITAT MUMBAI

2015 (6) TMI 207 - ITAT MUMBAI - TMI - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 57(iii) - Held that:- In view of the facts in issue as well as the following judgment of “CIT vs. Rajendra Prasad Moody” (1978 (10) TMI 133 - SUPREME Court), the judgment of “CIT vs. Darashaw & Co. Pvt. Ltd.” (2014 (5) TMI 940 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT) and “CIT vs. M. Ethurayan” (2004 (7) TMI 39 - MADRAS High Court ), we find that the interest expenditure on the borrowed amount used for the purpose of investment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he learned CIT (A) 29 (hereinafter referred to as the CIT (A)) erred in law and on facts in confirming the assessment of the total income of the Appellant at ₹ 5835,060/- as against ₹ 2249398/- returned by the Appellant. 2. Order dt. 27/07/12 passed by Ld. CIT(A) as well as order dt. 31/10/11 passed by Ld. ACIT are bad in law as the same are not based on facts and based on assumptions or surmises or erroneous findings and has not considered submissions made by appellant. 3. The Ld. C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ound no.5 which contested action of Ld. ACIT in assessing director remuneration as income from salary instead of Income from Business or Profession as claimed by Appellant. 6. The Ld. CIT (A) erred in law and on facts in not adjudicating one of the ground of appeal being ground no.6 which contested as an alternative ground, without prejudice to above, the Ld. ACIT has erred in law and on facts in including interest income of minor childs of ₹ 4123008.49 in stead of ₹ 1601095.49 (4123 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2, 6 & 7 of the assessee s appeal are dismissed as pleaded. Accordingly, the ground Nos.1, 2, 6 & 7 of the assessee s appeal are dismissed being not pressed. 3. Ground Nos.3 to 5 are regarding the disallowance of interest expenditure under section 57(iii) of the Act. The assessee has filed its return of income declaring total income of ₹ 22,49,398/-. During the assessment proceedings the Assessing Officer (AO) has noted that the assessee disclosed interest income of ₹ 23,64,3 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re utilized for acquiring controlling interest in M/s. Sim Diam P. Ltd. and therefore the interest is not allowable in view of the judgment of Hon ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Amritaben R. Shah 238 ITR 777. 4. The assessee challenged the action of the AO before the Ld. CIT(A) but could not succeed. The Ld. CIT(A) has held that the assessee has borrowed fund and diverted it to investment in the shares and for the purpose of share capital in a closely held company. The Ld. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The Ld. A.R. further pointed out that the investment in the shares of M/s. Sim Diam P. Ltd. which is a closed company of the assessee was in fact loan which was converted into the capital. The assessee has invested the amount by giving loan to the said company on which the assessee earned interest income in the earlier years. However, in the year under consideration the said loan was already converted into the share capital, therefore the interest which was earned in the earlier year could not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sad Moody (1978) 115 ITR 519 (SC) and submitted that the Hon ble Supreme Court has held that what section 57(iii) requires is that the expenditure must be laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for the purpose of making or earning income. It is the purpose of the expenditure which is relevant in determining the applicability of section 57(iii) and that purpose must be making or earning of income. Therefore, it is not the prerequisite condition under section 57(iii) that this purpose must be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ance sheet as on 31.03.06 the borrowings to the extent of ₹ 3,08,56,407/- were utilized in the investment in the erstwhile partnership firm of ₹ 3,18,24,635/- to earn interest there from, remuneration and share in the profit. The business of erstwhile firm was succeeded by M/s. Sim Diam P. Ltd. w.e.f. 01.04.06. As per the balance sheet as on 31.03.07 borrowing to the extent of ₹ 6,33,64,665/- were utilized in giving loan to M/s. Sim Diam P. Ltd. to the tune of ₹ 3,58,01,1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sions: 1. Delite Enterprises (P.) Ltd. vs. Income-tax Officer [(2008) 22 SOT 245 (Bom.)] dated February, 2008. 2. CIT vs. M/s. Delite Enterprises (P.) Ltd. ITXA No.110 of 2009 dated February, 2009 (Bom.) 3. M/s. Avshesh Mercantile (P.) Ltd. vs. DCIT (2012) 26 Taxmann.com 43 (Mum.) 4. CIT vs. Darashaw & Co. (P.) Ltd. (2014) 49 Taxmann.com 143(Bom.) 5. M/s. Topstar Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (2011) 334 ITR 374 (Bom.) 6. ACIT vs. M/s. Delite Enterprises (P.) Ltd. (2011) 135 TTJ 663 (Mum.) 7. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

allowable under section 57(iii) of the Act as the expenditure was not incurred for the purpose of earning the interest income. The assessee has also taken loan from Smt. Sohnidevi Sethia which was utilized for giving loan to M/s. Sim Diam P. Ltd. of ₹ 28,00,000/- and to Karvy Infrastructure of ₹ 90,00,000/-. The assessee received back a sum of ₹ 18,00,000/- from M/s. Sim Diam P. Ltd. and gave it to Sanghavi Savla Stock Broker thus the interest bearing amount was diverted for in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

penditure on said amount is not allowable under section 57(iii). He has relied upon the orders of the authorities below. 7. We have heard the Ld. D.R. as well as the Ld. A.R. and considered the relevant material on record. The AO has disallowed the interest expenditure under section 57(iii) on the ground that the major part of the interest bearing loan amount was used by the assessee in the investment of shares of M/s. Sim Diam P. Ltd. as well as other listed and non listed companies, therefore .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

esh loan from four parties namely Shri Rohit Manhot, Sim Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., Sohnidevi Sethia and Aman Sethia during the year under consideration. The other amounts were outstanding balances of the earlier years and shown as opening balance. There is no dispute that there was no disallowance of interest expenditure under section 57(iii) in the earlier as well as about the fact that earlier the assessee has invested in the partnership firm, the business of which was succeeded by M/s. Sim Diam P. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nterest income to the assessee. Therefore to that extent there is no question of the investment made for not earning any income. So far as the remaining investment is concerned, the AO has disallowed the corresponding interest expenditure on the ground that the assessee has not earned any income on the said investment. It is pertinent to note that what is required for allowing the deduction under section 57(iii) is the purpose of the expenditure incurred by the assessee and the said purpose is f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

king or earning income. It is the purpose of the expenditure that is relevant in determining the applicability of s. 57(iii) and that purpose must be making or earning of income. s. 57(iii) does not require that this purpose must be fulfilled in order to qualify the expenditure for deduction. It does not say that the expenditure shall be deductible only if any income is made or earned. There is in fact nothing in the language of s. 57(iii) to suggest that the purpose for which the expenditure is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

12(2) of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922, which was ipsissima verba in the same terms as s. 57(iii). Bose J., speaking on behalf of the court, observed : " It is not necessary to show that the expenditure was a profitable one or that in fact any profit was earned. " It is indeed difficult to see how, after this observation of the court, there can be any scope for controversy in regard to the interpretation of s. 57(iii). It is also interesting to note that, according to the revenue, the exp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on the argument of the revenue, the expenditure would have to be ignored as it would not be liable to be deducted. This would indeed be a strange and highly anomalous result and it is difficult to believe that the legislature could have ever intended to produce such illogicality. Moreover, it must be remembered that when a profit and loss account is cast in respect of any source of income, what is allowed by the statute as proper expenditure would be debited as an outgoing and income would be cr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

can cease to be such merely because there is no receipt of income. Whatever is a proper outgoing by way of expenditure must be debited irrespective of whether there is receipt of income or not. That is the plain requirement of proper accounting and the interpretation of s. 57(iii) cannot be different. The deduction of the expenditure cannot, in the circumstances, be held to be conditional upon the making or earning of the income. 9. There is a potential income in the shape of dividend on the inv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

0. The issue before us is the allowability of the expenditure under section 57(iii) and therefore even if the potential dividend income may be an exempted income which may attract the provisions of section 14A but in the absence of any such disallowance by the AO the issue does not arise from the orders of the authorities below for reconsideration. Therefore as far as the conditions for allowability of the expenditure under section 57(iii) if the expenditure is laid out for the purpose of earnin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee for the investment which was capable of earning the income the condition under section 57(iii) is fulfilled. By following the judgment of Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Rajendra Prasad Moody (supra) the Hon ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Darashaw & Co. Pvt. Ltd. 226 Taxman 193 held in para 11 as under: 11. In our view, after this authoritative pronouncement by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, there is no scope for any other construction and par .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

xpenditure and that is relevant. The argument of Mr. Gupta is that the purpose of the expenditure and in the present case, has a relation with the income that is to be eventually earned from the MSRDS bonds. That the bonds were disposed of means the income by way of interest thereon would not accrue any longer. Therefore, the deduction by way of interest on borrowings and which is stated to be a liability was not a permissible deduction. That is the precise argument which has been dealt with and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

atute as proper expenditure would be debited as an outgoing and income would be credited as a receipt and the resulting income or loss would be determined. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that how expenditure which is otherwise a proper expenditure can cease to be a such merely because there is no receipt of income, has not been explained by the revenue at all. It is in these circumstances the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that Section 57(iii) does not require that the purpose must be fulfil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al income and the purpose of expenditure laid out for earning the potential income on the investment but have given much emphasis on actual earning of income and investment of M/s. Sim Diam P. Ltd. for controlling the state. A similar view is taken by the Hon ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT vs. M. Ethurajan (273 ITR 95 (Mad) in para 9 to 11 as under: 9. It is not in dispute that the respondent/assessee was a major shareholder of Binny and Co. Ltd., which was referred to by the BIFR as a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

12-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version