Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s R.M. Dhariwal (HUF) Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III

2015 (6) TMI 504 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Refund claim - Interest on delayed refund - Held that:- Refund claim was filed on 19/2/2009 and same was sanctioned on 30/9/2009. Hence there is apparent delay in sanctioning refund claim. It is observed that the refund is against pre-deposit of amount as directed by the Tribunal in some other matter. Appellant filed refund claim alongwith self-attested copies of TR-6 Challan and same was sufficient for sanctioning the refund claim for simple reason that the pre-deposit was ordered by the Tribun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

thin the time period of three months which he failed to do. - appellant is legally entitled for interest on the refund claim for the period beyond three months from the date of filing of application of refund till the sanction of refund claim in terms of 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. E/614/10-MUM - Dated:- 15-4-2015 - Ramesh Nair, Member (J),J. For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : Shri V K Shastri, Asst. Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per: Rames .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d was sanctioned vide Order-in-Original dated 30/9/2009. Aggrieved by the said order inasmuch as refund was sanctioned beyond the prescribed time limit of three months, the appellant filed appeal for claim of interest for the delayed sanction of refund before the Commissioner (Appeals). Ld. Commissioner vide the impugned order rejected the appeal of the appellant, therefore the appellant is before me. 2. When the matter was called for the hearing none appeared on behalf of the appellant nor any .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

-submission of documents by the appellant therefore appellant is not entitled for claim of interest. 4. I have carefully considered the submission made by Ld. A.R. as well as gone through the records. I find that refund claim was filed on 19/2/2009 and same was sanctioned on 30/9/2009. Hence there is apparent delay in sanctioning refund claim. It is observed that the refund is against pre-deposit of amount as directed by the Tribunal in some other matter. Appellant filed refund claim alongwith s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version