Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACIT, Range-9 (1) /ITO-9 (1) (3) , Mumbai Versus M/s. Edicon Mining Equipment Pvt. Ltd.

Disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- Where the assessee had established availability of funds of its own and also where the investment was made in 100% subsidiary of the assessee, which in turn was engaged in the same line of business and had utilised the funds for its business, the existence of commercial expediency stands proved. In case the connection between the lender and the borrower is of commercial expediency, then in view of the r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that much less remuneration was paid in the case of sister concern. Although, this could be a starting point to suspect that excessive remuneration was paid but for effecting an addition the suspicion has to be grounded on fair market value of services rendered. The A.O. however, did not carry out such exercise. On the other hand the appellant has explained that the appellant is a 35 year old company whereas the subsidiary is only in business for last 4 years. It has also been mentioned that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the disallowance of ₹ 22,80,000/- is directed to deleted. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No. 7758/Mum/2010, ITA No. 1364/Mum/2011, ITA No. 5088/Mum/2012 - Dated:- 10-6-2015 - R. C. Sharma, AM And Sushma Chowla, JM,JJ. For the Appellant : Shri Neil Philip For the Respondent : Shri B P Agarwal ORDER Per Sushma Chowla, JM. Out of this bunch of three appeals filed by Revenue the appeal in ITA No. 7758/Mum/2010 is filed against the order of CIT(A)-19 Mumbai dated 07.09.2010 relating to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/Mum/ 2011, has raised the following grounds of appeal: - "1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of ₹ 18,50,000/- being interest disallowed u/s. 36(1)(iii) of the I.T. Act, 1961, overlooking the failure of the assessee to substantiate that the amounts borrowed were for the purpose of the assessee's business. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in placing relia .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeals are similar, however, reference is being made to the facts in ITA No. 7758/Mum/2010 to adjudicate the issue. 5. Briefly in the facts of the case, assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing of Pneumatic Tools. During the course of assessment proceedings the AO noticed that assessee had made investment of ₹ 110 lakhs in the shares of its subsidiary company, i.e. Edicon Pneumatic Tools Co. Pvt. Ltd., which included advance against shares of ₹ 109 lakhs. During the yea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d investment made for non business purposes should not be disallowed under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. In reply assessee stated that the said investment was made in 100% subsidiary company by way of share capital of ₹ 1 lakh and share application money of ₹ 109 lakhs and advance of ₹ 75 lakhs. The said investment was claimed to have been made out of Capital & Reserves and surplus of the company and it was claimed that no disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rpose of assessee's own business. Further, the claim of the assessee that investment was made for the purpose of business was also not accepted, since the subsidiary company was an altogether different entity. The AO thus held that disallowance of ₹ 18,50,000/- was warranted under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. 6. The CIT(A) noted that the loans and advances have been advanced to 100% subsidiary of the assessee, which was also carrying on the same business as the assessee. Further, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

disallowance is warranted under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. 7. Revenue is in appeal against the said order of the CIT(A). The learned D.R. for the Revenue pointed out that where the assessee had borrowed funds on interest and investment was made in tax free funds, though with the subsidiary, in the absence of any trade between the two and in the absence of any commercial expediency, there was no merit in the plea of the assessee. 8. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the assessee poi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h same Directors. The next plea raised by him was that the income earned by the subsidiary goes to the holding company, hence the said investment was made for business purposes. Reliance in this regard was placed upon the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of S.A. Builders Ltd. vs. CIT 288 ITR 1 (SC). 9. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. The issue arising in the present appeal is in relation to computation of disallowance, if any, under the pro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed on by the assessee. The claim of assessee before the AO was that the said investment was made for business purposes, hence no disallowance of interest was warranted under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. The first advance was made by assessee to its subsidiary company vis-a-vis investment in the shares of the said subsidiary company in A.Y. 2005-06. It was claimed by the assessee that the said investment was out of its share capital. However, the AO dismissed the contention of the assessee and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. The addition made by the AO was ₹ 2,21,731/- and because the small tax effect no appeal was filed before the Revenue against the said order. 10. In the instant year, assessee had further advanced ₹ 75 lakhs to its subsidiary company. A perusal of the Balance Sheet filed for A.Y. 2006-07 at pages 1 to 5 of the paper book reflects that though the capital of the assessee company remained at ₹ 20 lakhs but the Reserves and surpluses are at S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ence of commercial expediency stands proved. In case the connection between the lender and the borrower is of commercial expediency, then in view of the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SA Builders Ltd. (supra), no disallowance is warranted under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. In view thereof we hold that there is no justification for disallowing interest under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act and uphold the order of the CIT(A). We dismiss the grounds of appeal Nos. 1 & 2 rai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e ground that for A.Y. 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08, the department has accepted the CIT(A)'s decision. The disallowance made by the Assessing Officer as interest expenses was on account of interest free advances, which were not used for the purpose of assessee's business. Further, the CIT(A)'s order for A.Y. 2005-06 was not challenged due to low tax effect and appeals on the same issue have been preferred against CIT(A)'s order for A.Y. 2006-07 & 2007-08. 2. Whether on the f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

;s failure to justify the heavy expenses claimed by it as against the expenses claimed by its sister concern which enjoys benefit u/s. 10B. 13. The issue in ground No. 1 raised by Revenue is identical to the ground No. 1 raised in A.Y. 2006-07 and A.Y. 2007-08, which we have adjudicated in the paras hereinabove. Following the same parity of reasoning, we uphold the order of the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. Accordingly ground No. 1 raised by Revenue is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in the same line of business and having common Directors. As per the AO it was evident that similar nature of services were rendered by the Directors in both the companies. The only difference between the companies was that assessee company was 36 years old whereas the subsidiary was only 5 years old and in view thereof AO allowed only a remuneration of ₹ 3,50,000/- and the balance remuneration of ₹ 22,80,000/- was disallowed. 15. The CIT(A), on consideration of the facts, observed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: 3B mistake

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version