Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Vishnubhai Bapubhai Patel Versus Income-tax Officer, Ward-8 (2) , Ahmedabad

Computation of long term capital gains - whether there is not cost of acquisition ascertained in this case u/s.49(1)(i) in the hands of previous owner for computing impugned capital gains? - two additional grounds that stamp duty valuation as stated on the partition deed has been wrongly adopted as fair market value as on the date of acquisition of the property And the impugned long term capital gains have been wrongly assessed in his hands instead of that in case of eponymous HUF - Held that:- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessee’s arguments challenging assessment of capital gains in his hands rather than HUFs fail.

Valuation of the property on the basis of partition deed dated 16.9.1975 - Held that:- As already narrated that this asset came from an earlier HUF after a registered partition. The value of the total assets was determined at ₹ 2,67,750/- and the impugned capital asset was valued at ₹ 55,050/-. We reiterate that that it’s a duly registered document enjoying presumption of correc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erty sold as on 1.4.1981 for the purpose of computation of capital gains - Held that:- The authorities below have not granted him the benefit of appreciation of the asset’s value for the period from 1975 to 1.4.1981 in computing long term capital gains. The Revenue fails to rebut this factual position. We deem it appropriate to observe that the impugned assessment year is 2008-09. Much water has flown down the stream. Thus, instead of remanding this issue back, we feel that larger interest justi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ORDER PER S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER This assessee s appeal for A.Y.2008-09, arises from order of the CIT(A)-XIV, Ahmedabad dated 30.09.2011, passed in case no.CIT(A)-XIV/Wd.8(2)/82/10-11, upholding long term capital gains addition of ₹ 9,71,675/- in proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act,1961, in short the Act . 2. The assessee is an individual. He sold the capital asset in question on 29.1.2008 for ₹ 12.75 lacs. He did not admit any capital gains. The Assessing Of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

capital asset in question in said partition deed. The same stated its value to be ₹ 55,050/-. The Assessing Officer in these facts was of the view that cost of acquisition had to be taken as that ascertained in the abovestated partition deed. He also observed that the assessee had not exercised his option regarding valuation of his capital asset u/s.55(3) of the Act. The Assessing Officer accordingly adopted value of the sold as ₹ 55,050/- u/s.49(1)(ii)(a) and computed long term capi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vs. CIT [281 ITR 19, Gujarat].The claim of the appellant is on a wrong belief. In the case of Mandharsinh P. Jadeja, the facts show that the property was acquired by him by way of conquest and, therefore, the cost of acquisition in that case was NIL and accordingly the capital gain could not be applied to the consideration received on account of sale. In contrast to this, the appellant's property is an inherited property which was acquired by the forefathers of the appellant long time back .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e with the appellant and, therefore, it cannot be taken M that the cost of acquisition is NIL. Accordingly, the claim of the appellant regarding explanation to Section 49(1) is, not accepted. The appellant has further submitted that the practical applicability of section 55 sub section fails because in the appellant's case, the date of acquisition by previous owner (as contemplated u/s. 49(1) r.w. explanation) is rot available. The argument of the appellant has-been effectively dealt with by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ch the capital asset became the property of the previous owner". The provisions of section are very clear. The A.O. has correctly applied the same and taken the COST of acquisition as the fair market value of the property on the date of partition. The fair market value has been determined by the sub - registrar for the purpose of valuation of stamp duty on the date of partition i.e. the date on which the appellant became the owner of the property. During the course of assessment proceedings .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of land is upheld. The ground of appeal is, therefore, dismissed. The appellant has also mentioned in the written submission dated 02/09/2011 that without prejudice to the earlier submission regarding the capital gain, the appellant acquired the HUF property which is evident from the deed of partition dated 06/09/75 and, therefore, Vishnubhai B. Patel (HUF) is liable for capital gain and not Vishnubhai B. Patel (Individual). The argument has been mentioned in the written submission as ground No .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t there is not cost of acquisition ascertained in this case u/s.49(1)(i) in the hands of previous owner for computing impugned capital gains. He has also filed two additional grounds that stamp duty valuation as stated on the partition deed (supra) has been wrongly adopted as fair market value as on the date of acquisition of the property. And also that the impugned long term capital gains have been wrongly assessed in his hands instead of that in case of eponymous HUF. The Revenue objects to ad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

term capital gains in its case. He has replied in negative. Nor does he place on record HUF s record showing his asset s ownership in the past. The case file demonstrates that the said HUF holds a PAN (page no.78). Therefore, we observe that the assessee is not entitled to shift assessment of impugned capital gains in HUF s hands. Therefore, the assessee s arguments challenging assessment of capital gains in his hands rather than HUFs fail. 5. Now, we come to next argument of the assessee chall .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM – Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version