Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (7) TMI 306 - CESTAT CHENNAI

2015 (7) TMI 306 - CESTAT CHENNAI - TMI - Waiver of pre dpeosit - clearance of goods cleared by an 100% EOU to DTA - Held that:- Appellant an EOU cleared goods on stock transfer to DTA clearance by adopting the price available in their own DTA unit whereas the department enhanced the value by adopting Rule 8 read with CVR. The LAA has relied upon Board’s circular No.268/85-CX-8 dt. 29.9.94 whereas we find that said circular has been withdrawn by the Board vide circular No.933/23/2010 dt. 16.8.20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

granted. - E/S/41255/2014, E/S/41256/2014 in E/41010/2014, E/41011/2014 - MISC ORDER No.40890-40891/2015 - Dated:- 23-6-2015 - Shri R. Periasami and Shri P.K. Choudhary, JJ. For The Appellant : Shri K.S. Venkatagiri, Advocate For The Respondent : Ms. Indira Sisupal,AC (AR) ORDER Per R. Periasami The appellant filed applications for waiver of predeposit. Both the stay applications are arising out of common OIA dt. 18.2.2014 and therefore they are taken up together for disposal. 2. The issue rela .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ding the excise duty where the department has demanded higher value. He further submits that Commissioner (Appeals) at para-5 relied Board s circular dt. 29.9.2004 and the said circular has been withdrawn vide circular No.933/23/2010-CX dt. 16.8.2010 and also relied Tribunal s decision in the case of Nagreeka Exports Ltd. Vs CCE Pune - 2003 (259) ELT 891 (Tri.Mum.) where the Tribunal has categorically issued and held that DTA sale to be considered as cum duty price. 4. Ld. A.R relied upon the fi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

upon Board s circular No.268/85-CX-8 dt. 29.9.94 whereas we find that said circular has been withdrawn by the Board vide circular No.933/23/2010 dt. 16.8.2010 and also considering the Tribunal s decision in the case of Nagreeka Exports Ltd. Vs CCE Pune (supra), we find that issue stands decided in favour of appellants. The relevant paragraph of the above cited decision is reproduced as under:- "11. As regards the issue relating to valuation for the purpose of charging duty, the learned Jt. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lue and the duty amount has to be worked out from the same. The learned Jt. C.D.R. contends that in view of the specific provision contained in the proviso to Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, valuation for DTA sale has to be done in accordance with Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 under which there is no concept of cum-duty price and that the transaction value has to be applied. In this connection he cites the decision of the Tribunal in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version