Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Satyam Venture Engg. Services Private Limited Hyderabad and others Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3 (1) Hyderabad and others

Revision u/s 263 - TPO allowed commission while passing orders under sec. 92CA(3) - Held that:- CIT erred in holding that in the absence of section 92CA(4) during the relevant period, it is not binding on the AO to follow the order of TPO. The order of CIT is contrary to the CBDT instruction No.3 of 2003 wherein it is clarified that the AO has to compute the total income of the assessee having regard to the arms length price so determined by TPO.

CIT ought not to have assumed jurisdic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng Officer had applied their mind and allowed the entire commission while passing orders under sec. 92CA(3) and 143(3) respectively as claimed by the assessee. Hence we annul the order of CIT passed under sec.263. - Decided in favour of assessee.

Transfer pricing adjustment - Disallowance by the AO on the basis of arm’s length price of I.T. Engineering services worked out by the TPO i.e. Add. CIT, Transfer Pricing, Hyderabad vide his order u/s 92CA - main emphasis of the assessee is t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

determining the ALP by stating that no assessee will charge a rate which is at great variance with the normal market rate of the services provided considering the fact that it was a new client who whom the assessee will try to get more business in future. Hence the CIT observed that despite less transactions, the rates charged by the assessee in case of new client. Therefore, the CIT had rightly directed for an adjustment of account difference in the rate under the TP provisions worked @ US$ 9 p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

djusted rates adopted by the TPO ($50.52 (-) @ 2.52) while determining the ALP, considered the facts and circumstances of the case. We confirm the order of the CIT (A). - Decided against assessee and revenue.

Reopening of assessment - Addition made by disallowing a portion of the deduction U/s.I0A arises on account of adjustment to the export turnover - Held that:- The AO proceeded to assess the income by issuing a normal questionnaire seeking information from the assessee. He had not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the I.T. Act, 1961 after having assessed and re-assessed u/s 143(3) and section 263. Since we have decided the jurisdictional grounds in favour of the assessee, we are not adjudicating on the other grounds of appeal raised before us. - Decided in favour of assessee.

Validity of reopening U/s.147 - Assessing Officer reopened the assessment under section 147 beyond the period of four years - Held that:- There is no fresh fact or ‘tangible material’ to come to the conclusion that ther .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ided in favour of assessee.

- ITA No.492/Hyd/2008 & ITA No.196/Hyd/2011,ITA No.783/Hyd/2008,ITA No.924/Hyd/2008,1136/Hyd/2013 & 1137/Hyd/2013,ITA No.1904/Hyd/2011 - Dated:- 1-7-2015 - Shri P.M. Jagtap & Smt.Asha Vijayaraghavan, JJ. For the Petitioner : Shri C.S. Subramanyam & Shri V. Siva Kumar For the Respondent : Smt. G. Aparna Rao, DR ORDER Per Smt. Asha Vijayaraghavan, J.M. These are the appeals preferred by the assessee and the Revenue against the orders of the lower autho .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

56 is towards commission payable to Venture Global on the sales made to M/s Satyam Computer Services Ltd and its affiliates. The TPO and the AO allowed the entire commission, while passing orders u/s 92CA(3) and 143(3) respectively as claimed by the assessee. The said commission payable/paid to M/s. Global Engineering of USA (Venture Global) on sales made to M/s Satyam Computer Services Ltd (SCSL) and M/s. Satyam Manufacturing Technologies Inc. etc., was issue under consideration in the revision .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

llowable. 3. The assessment order was considered erroneous by the CIT in so far as it relates to the above issue and as such prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. He rejected the contention of the assessee that the commission was payable as per the agreement entered into with Venture Global stating that such an agreement is not the final document to decide whether the expenditure is genuine. He also stated that the nature of services rendered by Venture Global do not fall under the head charge .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ces rendered to a partner of the joint venture who is well aware of the product. 5. The CIT justified the initiation of proceedings u/s 263 stating that prior to amendment of section 92CA(4) w.e.f. 1.6.2007, the TPO s order was not binding on the AO and thus the AO was empowered to alter the TPO s order. The CIT held that since the AO did not exercise his power while passing order u/s 143(3) of the Act, the said order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. 6. Having held that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. He also directed the AO to invoke the provisions of section 92C(3) and pass the order accordingly. 7. On appeal against the order u/s 263, the ld Counsel for the assessee submitted as follows: • As regards the direction of the CIT, for following TPO s order for subsequent A.Y viz., A.Y 2004-05 it was submitted that the TPO disallowed commission paid on sales made to SCSL and its affiliates for that year on grounds of commercial expediency and this could not have been one of the considerat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the same nor on the reason that the assessee has not justified the benefit principle. ITAT took support from the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of EKL Appliances (2012) (24 taxmann.com 199) (Delhi High Court). It was argued that the view taken by the CIT that the order of the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue for the reason that the rationale of the order of TPO for A.Y 2004-05 was not followed, cannot be sustained in the light of the legal position submit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is position, the acceptance of the TPO s order by the AO cannot be held to be prejudicial to revenue. In this connection reliance was placed on the decision of ITAT A Bench Hyderabad in ITA Nos.549/H/2014 and 595/H/2015 dated 13.10.2014 in the case of M/s. OWENS Corning Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd Hyderabad wherein it has been held that once RBI approval of royalty rate was obtained, the payment was to be held as at Arm s Length. • Assessee, therefore, submitted that even if the CIT was cor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ethod of commercial expediency adopted by the TPO for A.Y 2004-05 which was recommended by the CIT for consideration by the AO has been struck down as totally unacceptable by the appellate authorities including the jurisdictional bench of ITAT. 8. The ld DR relied on the order of the AO. 9. We have heard both the parties. We are of the opinion that the CIT erred in holding that in the absence of section 92CA(4) during the relevant period, it is not binding on the AO to follow the order of TPO. T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nadequate, the jurisdiction under Sec. 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be assumed as it was only in the cases of lack of enquiries that the jurisdiction under Sec. 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961 can be assumed. Reliance in this regard is placed on the following decisions: 1. CIT v. Anil Kumar Sharma - 335 ITR 83 (Delhi); 2. CIT v. Sunbeam Auto Ltd. 332 ITR 167 (Delhi); 3. CIT v. Gabriel India Ltd. 203 ITR 108 (Bom) In the present case before us the TPO and the Assessing Officer had applied their .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee against the order passed by the AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act is to be allowed in favour of the assessee. 2. In the result assessee s appeal is allowed. ITA No.783/Hyd/2008 - (A.Y 2003-04) Revenue s Appeal & ITA No.924/Hyd/2008: (A.Y. 2003-04) Assessee s appeal 1. This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order of the CIT (A)-III Hyderabad, dated 20.02.2008 passed for A.Y 2003- 04 and the main issue involved in the appeal is regarding the disallowance of ₹ 92,83, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing 10% reduction for sales commission payable on the sales made to non-AEs @ $50.52 per hour. The assessee explained to the TPO that the General Motors (GM) was a new customer during the relevant year and the volume of services provided by the assessee to GM was quite less, on account of which higher rates were charged. However, the TPO observed that the assessee itself had asked for adoption of CUP method and there was no adjustment possible while applying the comparison under CUP method. In v .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ofits on account of which the income has been finally assessed at ₹ 43,17,240. 4. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before the CIT (A). 5. In Ground No.2, assessee disputed the AO s finding that on site services billed to Venture USA and Venture Germany were not at arm s length. Ground Nos. 3 to 5 and ground No.7 are again extension and elaboration of the main ground taken by the assessee against the adjustment made by the TPO/AO by comparison of prices of services rendered to AEs with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

40 times more than the hours billed to Non AE (M/s. General Motors). Therefore, suitable adjustment should be made in the hourly rates to give effect to the volume of business generated. (ii) The provision similar to that of Transfer Pricing Regulations exist in the Customs regulations of India also to determine the Arm/s Length price of the goods imported into India. The courts on similar disputes on comparability of prices under customs law have held that the prices compared should take into a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nture USA and Venture Germany. 7. The ld CIT (A) Held as follows: 6.2 On careful consideration of the submissions of the appellant, I find that there is some force in the argument of appellant that the AO should have made suitable adjustments before making the comparison of rates charged by the appellant for similar services to its AEs and non AEs, looking to the difference in volume of transactions and the fact of General Motors being a new client for the appellant in F.Y. 2002-03. However, I a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rpose of comparison in this case. In view of this, looking to the functional similarity, I uphold the adoption of services given to M/s. General Motors as comparable with the services provided to the AEs by the TPO/AO, on the facts of the case. 6.3 The next important issue requiring consideration is the adjustment/deduction in rates required to be given on account of high difference in volume of transactions, as contended by the Ld ARs of the appellant during the appeal proceedings. I feel that, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

which is at great variance with the normal market rate of the services provided, considering the fact that it was a new client with whom the assessee will try to get more business in future. Hence, despite low volume of transactions, the rates charged by the assessee would not be too high in case of the new client. However, keeping in view the substantial difference in the volume of transactions with M/s. General Motors vis-a-vis the AEs of the appellant, I feel that a deduction of 5% from the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed out @ $9 per hour. The total difference worked out on this basis, adopting the conversion rate mentioned by the TPO at ₹ 48.23, would come to (16,708 hours x 9 x 48.23), or ₹ 72,52,442/-, against the difference adopted by the Assessing Officer at ₹ 92,83,125/- in the assessment order. This difference of ₹ 72,52,440/- will be added to the income disclosed by the appellant in place of the addition made by the Assessing Officer at ₹ 92,83,125/-. 'The grounds tak .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

trarily allowing 5% adjustment. 3. The ld CIT (A) has compared the prices charged to non-AE customer M/s General Motors for 424 hours as against 16,208 hours provided to Associated Enterprises (Venture Group) and adjustment of 5% does not commensurate with the difference in volume of hours worked. 4. The ld CIT (A) ought to have followed the conditions provided in Rule 10B(2) and (3) of Income Tax Act before resorting comparison of the prices. 5. The ld CIT (A) has erred in holding that the rate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at the CIT (A) failed to grant necessary adjustment for the price difference on a scientific basis and proceeded on an adhoc basis by granting a deduction @ 5% which is not in accordance with Rule 10B. The ld Counsel further submitted that the assessee worked for nearly 40 times more with AE when compared to non- AE. It was further submitted in addition General Motors is a new customer taken on trial basis and hence the company has quoted higher price as it was not sure whether or not the custom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

owing the assessee s appeal. 2. The CIT (A) III Hyderabad ought to have appreciated the action of the AO in working of service charges @ $50.52 per hour instead of US $ 48 per hour adopted by the CIT (A) Hyderabad. 3. The CIT (A) ought to have appreciated the action of the AO that he has adopted service charges @ USD 50.52 per hour as determined by the TPO. 4. The CIT (A) ought to have appreciated the action of the TPO that he has determined the service charges as per CUP method as asked by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

statement of the DR as being that when CUP method is adopted as an appropriate method, no adjustment can be made to the price taken as comparable. The ld Counsel for the assessee stated that this proposition is in violation to Rule 10B(3)(ii) which mandates that the reasonable accurate adjustment need to be made to eliminate effects of difference. Otherwise, the non-AE transactions, as such, cannot be made as comparable to AE transactions. 14. The ld Counsel relied on the decision of the Mumbai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ared without making suitable adjustment towards the volume of business as the working hours provided to AE is 40 times more than the hours billed to M/s General Motors. However, we are in confirmity with the order of the CIT (A) wherein he has applied his mind and discussed elaborately at Para Nos. 6.3 and 6.4. The CIT (A) has justified the deduction of 5% from the adjusted rate adopted by the TPO while determining the ALP by stating that no assessee will charge a rate which is at great variance .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the prices to a comparable level has been satisfied by the CIT (A) by giving a reduction of 5%. The CIT (A) was of the opinion that the reduction of 5% is sufficient with respect to the facts of the case, we also confirm. 17. The ground of the Department is that in Ground No.4, once CUP method is adopted, no adjustment is possible is incorrect and the CIT (A) has given sufficient adjustment of deduction at 5% from the adjusted rates adopted by the TPO ($50.52 (-) @ 2.52) while determining the AL .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s export of software engineering services, sales commission, man power resource support, reimbursement of CEO's remuneration) with AE which were examined in detail by TPO culminating into an addition to the export sales based on arm's length computation. The TPO based on the Comparable Uncontrollable Price (CUP) method for determination of the arm's length price adopted by the company, proposed an adjustment of ₹ 93 lakhs to the export income recognized by the company. The asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cement to the income was determined at ₹ 57 lakhs as against ₹ 93 lakhs referred above. Aggrieved by the said order of CIT(A) the revenue and the company are in cross appeals before the ITAT which are pending disposal. 3. Subsequently the assessment for AY 2003-04 was revised by the CIT U/s.263 of the IT Act. The CIT found that for the AY 2004-05, the AO disallowed portion of the sales commission paid by the assessee to its AE. Based on the information, the CIT directed that the inte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s associates. The entire sales commission paid on the sales received from SCSL was disallowed. Against the revised assessment the assessee filed appeal before CIT(A). 4. The CIT (A) dismissed the appeal. Assessee filed appeal against the CIT s order u/s 263 as well as the order of the CIT (A) on the revised assessment. The 263 order was annulled by our order in ITA No.492 and the appeal against giving effect to order passed by the AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 in ITA No.196/Hyd was also allowed in fa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he reasons so furnished vide its letter dt.27.10.2010. The AO disposed the objections to notice U/s.148 by a letter dt. 1.11.2011. 6. The AO proceeded to re-assess the income U/s.143(3) r.w.s 147 accordingly. The AO referred the transactions to the TPO for arm's length price evaluation and also to special audit U/s.142(2A). Nature of addition Amount (Rs.in ALP method by company ALP By TPO TPO order (adjustment on account of Commission paid to AE Net of disallowance in original 143(3) and 263 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

before the DRP by raising in summary the following grounds: 1. Sec.l47 - The reopening of assessment U/s.147 after completing the assessment U/s.l43(3) and U/s.l43(3) r.w.s 263 does not satisfy the conditions laid down U/s. 147. 2. The comparables adopted for determining the ALP of export sales is incorrect due to the functional differences between the Company and comparables. 3. Method adopted for determining the ALP for export sales by the TPO (TNMM) is incorrect. 4. ALP by the TPO for the co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts to the returned income as explained above. 12. Ground Nos.2 & 3 before us is whether reopening u/s 147 is valid or not. The validity or otherwise of the reopening of the assessment is being objected broadly on two grounds: i) The reason for reopening is vague and based on absence of any nexus to any of the operations of the assessee. ii) The assessment is finalized without resulting in any addition on account of reason for reopening. 13. The AO reopened the assessment under section 147 be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Chairman, Satyam Computer Services Ltd had written a letter to the Board of Directors of Satyam Computers wherein he elaborately explained various transactions of Satyam Computer Services Ltd which resulted in the financial statements being incorrect. In his statement he categorically stated that these kind of irregularities were limited to Satyam Computers alone and one of the operations of the subsidiaries have been affected. In the light of the said letter written by Mr. Ramalingaraju and his .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ons from the assessment record present the validity or otherwise of the reasons. Reason - I The assessee company is one of the group companies of Satyam Computers. The money originated from the family members had been transferred in circuitous and complex manner through front companies into investments and in creation of assets in the shape of large tracts of lands. The Ld Counsel s arguments are as follows: • The original assessment was completed U/s.143(3) by incorporating adjustments to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

) is extracted below: • "A notice U/s.92CA of the Income Tax Act along with questionnaire was issued to the assessee on 28. I O. 2005 requiring the assessee to furnish certain information and submit relevant documents. Authorized Representatives of the company appeared from time to time and furnish the required details and the case discussed with them. " • Paragraph 1 of the Assessment Order dt.31.03.2006 ....................... " in response to the posting notices issue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tions with all the group companies. Reason - II raised by A.O. for reopening The assessment of the assessee company was completed U/s.143(3) and the Assessing Officer is not aware of the likely variations in income and assets and liabilities of SCSL at the time of assessment. The transactions revealed by Mr. Ramalingaraju apparently will have bearing on the affairs of the group companies and their consequence income and assets position in view of the complex and circuitous nature of transactions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pointed out by him. Please refer to Para 2 of Letter by Mr.Ramalinga Raju (page 22 of paper book) stating that, " The gap in the Balance Sheet has arisen purely on account of inflated profits over a period of last several years (limited only to Satyam standalone, books of subsidiaries reflecting true performance). • The AO referred to circuitous and complex transactions by the front companies which resulted in creation of large tracts of land to the said companies. It may be appropria .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the material narrated by the AO in the reasons given by him related to the assessee company or had any bearing on the assessment. The assessee company is obliged to disclose truly and fully all the facts to enable completion of its assessments. The assessee cannot be obliged to disclose any information with respect to group companies which has no relevance to its assessments. • The assessee company is not an investment company nor has acquired any land at any point of its operations. Hen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nominated by both the partners. The organizational structure and the nature of operations do not in any way have remotest possible connection with any of the investment or front companies alleged by the AO. Hence, a reason though not necessarily conclusive, should have a minimum relevance to the nature of the business, transactions of the assessee company and, finally the income of the Company. The reasons cited by the AO are farfetched and fail to bring out at least a feeble or thin link with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ect to Reason III are as follows: • The reasoning under this is vague and general. It is a surmise and guess work of the AO. The AO had not presented any evidence that the financial statements of front companies are not true or fair. This is a conclusion without rational connection with the evidence (Statement of Mr.B.Ramalinga Raju) for formation belief. The claim u/s 10A of SCSL has no relevance with assessment of SVES. • The assessee company objected to the reasons for reopening fur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

8 r. w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act 1961 cannot be invoked. However the above statement and the events followed thereafter assumes significance in as much as the erstwhile Chairman of SCSL admitted that the Company's balance sheet as at September, 30, 2008 carried an inflated cash and bank balances, non-existent accrued interest, an understated liability and an overstated debtors position. As the SCSL's accounts/Balance sheet referred by the then Chairman, includes the financial results .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l and financial nexus between your company and parent company, SCSL, the assessing officer had prima facie reason to believe that the income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment given the volume of transactions and the item-wise confession made by the then Chairman of SCSL. In view of the above, your objection that the statement of Sri B.Ramalinga Raju does not contribute to subscribe to the reason to believe that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment has no meaning in it. " 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tments arise out of the Transfer Pricing Officer having changed his opinion in respect of determination of the arm's length price of the international transactions. None of the reasons cited by the AO for reopening of the assessment had indicated any possible escapement. The escapement of income contemplated U/s.147 should arise from either non recording of a particular stream of income / expenditure or short or excess recording thereof. Transfer Pricing adjustment are differences arising on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the retuned income on identical lines had taken place at the time of original assessment proceedings and subsequently during the proceedings U/s.263. 19. The addition made by disallowing a portion of the deduction U/s.I0A arises on account of adjustment to the export turnover. This adjustment to the income was carried out for the first time. However, this adjustment is not one of the reasons for which the assessment was reopened U/s.147 as for the reasons furnished by the AO. Further, the addit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

an amendment by Finance (2) Act. 2009 w.e.f. 1.4.1989. The introduction of the Explanation was to overcome to decisions of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and Rajasthan High Court which held that the AO after issue of notice U/s.148 has to restrict his re-assessment (addition) only to the limited extent of income which may have escaped based on the reasons for which the notice was issued. This barred the AO from making any addition other than addition arising on account of reason for reopening .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT vs. Jet Airways (I) Ltd (331 ITR 236) • Swarnandhara IJMII Integrated Township Development Company (ITA No.1803/Hyd/2012). • ACIT, Raipur vs. Major Deepak Mehta (24 Taxmann.com 147 Chattisgarh). • Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd vs. CIT (12 Taxmann.com 74 Delhi) • CIT vs. Mohd. Juned Dadani (30 Taxmann.com I. Guj.) 23. The DR relied on the decision in the case of Majinder Singh Kang v. CIT & Anr.(2012) 344 ITR 0358 and argued that reopening u/s 147 is valid. 24. We heard bot .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l held as under. (iv) The reopening was on wrong foundation of reasoning of the financial implication between the assessee-company and M/s Satyam Computer Services Limited, which was no established in the reassessment to justify reopening. 19. Hence, there being no nexus or live-link with the reasons recorded and the ' formation of belief' to come to a conclusion that there was escapement of income and also since the assessment has been reopened beyond the period of 4 years when there is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome by issuing a normal questionnaire seeking information from the assessee. He had not issued any specific letter seeking clarification on issues which prompted him to reopen the assessment. He issued show cause notice why the export turnover should not be reduced with respect to the expenditure in foreign currency. In the entire proceedings U/s.143(3) r.w.s 147, the AO had not asked any question or information connecting with the reason for reopening. Finally he completed the assessment U/s.14 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

opening was based on vague information and a mere reason to suspect, only. • Accordingly, neither enquiry nor addition on account, of reason to reopen resulted in the assessment u/ s 143 (3) read with section 147. 26. We rely on the decision of Ranjit Reddy vs. Dy. CIT, Hyderabad (2013) 144 ITD 361, wherein it has been held as follows: One needs to give a schematic interpretation to the words reason to believe failing which, section 147 would give arbitrary power to AO to reopen assessments .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ble material to come to the conclusion that there is escapement of income from assessment. Reasons must have a live link with the formation of the belief . 27. Further, para 32 at page 483 in the case of S. Ranjit Reddy (Supra), reads as follows: Same view was taken by the Third Member Mumbai Bench in the case of Telco Dadajee Dhackajee Ltd vs. Dy. CIT (ITA No.4613/Mum/2005 dated 12th May, 2010). Further same view was taken by Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Orient Crafts Ltd (2013) 29 t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssed u/s 143(3) and section 263. Since we have decided the jurisdictional grounds in favour of the assessee, we are not adjudicating on the other grounds of appeal raised before us. 29. In the result assessee s appeal is allowed. ITA No.1137/Hyd/2013 (A.Y 2004-05) 1. The original assessment U/s.143(3) was finalized by an order dated 28.12.2006 by the Assessing Officer basing on the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). The assessee had entered into various international transactions (such .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mpany. In this year for the first time the TPO also made an adjustment to the commission paid to Venture Global LLC of ₹ 86 Lakhs. 2. Apart from the addition recommended by the TPO the AO also eliminated certain expenditure incurred in foreign currency for computation of exemption U/s.10A. The exemption claimed as per the return of ₹ 1.9 Crores had been reduced to ₹ 0.24 Crores based on the adjustment to the export turnover. This resulted in a net adjustment of Rs.l.66 Crores o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

order both the revenue and the company are in cross appeals before the Hon'ble ITAT which are pending disposal. 4. This assessee is currently in appeal before the ITAT. The facts relating to this assessment are given below: 5. The AO issued a notice dated 14.03.2011 U/s.148 reopening the assessment and requesting the company to file a return of income. The said notice was received by the company on 21.03.2011. Subsequent to the notice the company requested the AO to consider the return of i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

142(2A). Nature of addition Amount (Rs. In crores) ALP method by company ALP Method by TPO TPO order (adjustment on account of ALP) Commission and reimbursement of professional charges paid to AE 4.84 Export sales 2.52 CUP TNMM Total 7.36 AO order Section 10A adjustment to export sales under explanation 2(iv) under section 10A 1.64 Total 9.00 7. Based on the Special Auditor s report and TPO s order, AO made a draft assessment order by proposing the above additions which are in dispute in this ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the TPO (TNMM) is incorrect. 4. ALP by the TPO for the commission payment without determining and identifying the comparables under CUP method is incorrect. 5. Adjustment to export sales to compute deduction U/s.10A is incorrect in the light of the settled position of the law. 9. The DRP had not appreciated the reasoning put forward by the company in support of the above said grounds and confirmed the draft assessment order of the AO. 10. The draft assessment order upon confirmation by the DRP c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

12. The Assessing Officer reopened the assessment under section 147 beyond the period of four years. Sec.147 permits the reopening/reassessment of assessment finalized under section 143(3) upon satisfaction of the AO that the assessee had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment for that assessment year. The reasons given by the AO to reopen assessment in the case of the company would provide a light on his reasoning to conclude failure to disclose fully an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

affected. In the light of the said letter written by Mr.Ramalingaraju and his subsequent statement before the department AO proposed to reopen the assessment U/s.147. explaining various facts derived from the statement of Mr.Ramalingaraju which according to him had a bearing on the assessment of the company. 14. The following are the three major reasons coming out of the reasons recoded by the AO to reopen the assessment U/s.147. The facts relating to these reasons from the assessment record pre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

92CA in respect of income from export of engineering services and commission payment to one of the AE ie., Venture Global (USA). Subsequently on appeal CIT (A) partly allowed the appeal and on commission payment the learned CIT (A) held that it is not an allowable expense as it is not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business in terms of section 37(1) of the Income tax Act, in view of the assessee's failure to establish the transaction in question i.e., the commission paym .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hus, there is no necessity for the assessee company to make the payment to Venture Global and accordingly the arm's length price on the Commission payment is to be NIL as against the payment claimed by assessee of ₹ 3,66,00,492 and ALP determined by the TPO of ₹ 2,80,36,178 on the facts misled by the assessee." The Ld Counsel submitted as follows: 15. The reasons given by the Assessing Officer stems out from the original assessment order, CIT(A) order and TPO's order. Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on assessment record and concluded ALP should have been at nil and demonstrated the change of his opinion by concluding the ALP should have been nil as against ₹ 2.8 Crores adopted in original assessment. This is a copy book replica of what an AO should not do for reopening an assessment u/s 147. Hence, there is neither reason nor a justification to reopen the assessment based on the above paragraphs. Reason - II given by the Assessing Officer is as follows:- "Given the fact that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has escape assessment, within the meaning of Section 147 read with section 149 of the l. T Act. and there is failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for its assessment for A. Y 2004-05. For the above detailed reasons, it is proposed to issue notice to the assessee under section 148 of the I. T Act to re-open the assessment in the assessee's case for the assessment year 2004-05 for bringing to tax the income chargeable to tax which has esc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y him. Please refer to Para 2 of Letter by Mr.Ramalinga Raju (page 22 of paper book of AY 2003-04) stating that, " The gap in the Balance Sheet has arisen purely on account of inflated profits over a period of last several years (limited only to Satvam standalone, books of subsidiaries reflecting true performance) 17. None of the material narrated by the AO in the reasons given by him related to the assessee company or had any bearing on the assessment. The assessee company is obliged to di .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Computer Services Ltd or any of the transactions narrated by him have not referred to the transaction of commission. 19. The reason elucidated by the AO should lead a rational person to the belief of possible escapement of income. In other words the reason should direct, an enquiry as to quantification of income that is found to have escaped assessment. The reason and the belief from the above cited paragraph stand poles apart without a nexus. Hence, the reasons cited by the AO to reopen the as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

meaning of reason to believe to reopen the assessment U/s.l47. As held by the Supreme Court at the stage of initiation of proceedings the AO should have a reason to believe and need not establish the facts of escapement of income. The test laid down by the Supreme Court is, whether based on the information before the AO any reasonable person could have formed an opinion to reopen the assessment. Hence, the AO should have demonstrated by feeblest of the fresh facts, relevant to the assessment of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

levant to the assessment of the company nor require disclosure. 22. The ld DR relied on the decision in the case of Majinder Singh Kang v. CIT & Anr.(2012) 344 ITR 0358 and argued that reopening u/s 147 is valid. 23. The ld Counsel for the assessee relied on the following judicial precedents: • CIT vs. Jet Airways (I) Ltd (331 ITR 236) • Swarnandhara IJMII Integrated Township Development Company (ITA No.1803/Hyd/2012). • ACIT, Raipur vs. Major Deepak Mehta (24 Taxmann.com 147 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

per se reason to reopen. The AO has no power to review; he has the power to reassess. But reassessment has to be taxed on fulfilment of certain pre-conditions and if the concept of change of opinion is removed, then, in the garb of reopening the assessment, review would take place. One must treat the concept of change of opinion as an inbuilt test to check abuse of power by the AO. Hence, the AO has power to reopen, provided there is tangible material to come to the conclusion that there is esca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e of Inductotherm India (P) Ltd v. Dy. CIT in Special Civil Application 858 of 2006 dated 6.8.2012. Further Bombay Bench in the case of Delta Airlines Inc. Vs. ITO (International Taxation) (2013) 33 Taxmann.com 192(Mum). 26. We are of the opinion that there is no fresh fact or tangible material to come to the conclusion that there is escapement of income from assessment. The entire joint venture agreement understanding between the parties and consideration for making the payment was put forth be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l: 1. Assessee filed return of income for A.Y 2002-03 on 31.10.2012 declaring a total income of ₹ 24,97,979. The company claimed exemption u/s 10A to the extent of ₹ 3,93,35,453. The said return of income was processed u/s 143(1) on 6.2.2003. Subsequently the assessment proceedings were reopened on 26.03.2009 u/s 148. 2. AO reopened the said proceedings u/s 148 by recording reasons for such reopening as required u/s 147. The AO recorded that Mr. S. Ramalinga Raju, Ex-Chairman of Saty .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

easoning, AO reopened assessment accordingly. It is pertinent to note that in the statement referred above Mr. Ramalinga Raju stated that accounts related to SCSL are not correct. He noted in his statement that the said practices were not carried out with regard to accounts of the subsidiary companies of SCSL. 5. AO referred the accounts of the assessee to special audit u/s 142(2A) in the light of the reasons recorded for reopening of the assessment. The special audit was considered appropriate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee company with AE made the following adjustments: (Rs.in crores) Nature of International transaction Amount as per financial statements Arm s Length price Adjustment Export of software Engineering services 1.33 1.5 0.17 Sales commission 3.35 Nil 3.35 Total adjustment 3.52 7. Based on the above adjustment to the international transactions as recommended by the TPO, AO finalized the assessment after considering the Special Audit Report and Transfer Pricing Officer order by making the following ad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sales. Assessee explained to the TPO that the commission was paid to the JV Partner Venture Global Engineering Services LLC that the said payments was made for customer identification, introduction, customer relations management and work solicitation and procurement. TPO failed to appreciate the object of the joint venture and the business synergy brought into the assessee company by both the JV Partners. He considered CUP method as the most appropriate method to determine the ALP for payment o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tiple year data for arriving at the arithmetic mean of the margins of comparable companies. He accordingly rejected the TP documentation filed. After having carried out analysis, he considered TNMM as the most appropriate method and accordingly applied the same. The PLI of 28.84% determined accordingly was applied as the percentage on operating cost (OP/OC) to ascertain the ALP adjustment. 10. AO had also recomputed the exemption u/s 10A while computing the income of the assessee company. AO had .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ds. 12. The grounds raised against the reopening u/s 147 were rejected by the DRP. DRP considered where a return is processed u/s 143(1) there is no finding given by the AO and hence reopening is justified. Despite the AO or TPO not having identified either bogus payments or inflated expenditure, the DRP erroneously observed that it is a well known fact that in this group the expenditure was inflated, bogus payments were made etc. For these reasons, they held the reopening u/s 147 as valid. 13. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment raised no objection for admission of the additional grounds. Hence, we admit the same. 16. The DR relied on the decision in the case of Majinder Singh Kang v. CIT & Anr.(2012) 344 ITR 0358 and argued that reopening u/s 147 is valid. 17. The validity or otherwise of the reopening of the assessment is being objected broadly on two grounds: i) The reason for reopening is vague and based on absence of any nexus to any of the operations of the assessee. ii) The assessment is finalized withou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sons recorded by the AO on the file are as follows: i) Mr S Ramalinga Raju, Ex-Chairman of SCSL wrote a letter to the Board of Directors of SCSL on 7 Jan 2009 confessing that the books of accounts of SCSL were not reported correctly. Mr Ramalinga Raju had also stated in his letter that the subsidiaries are reflecting true performance. ii) Sworn deposition recorded by the Department. Reiteration of the facts mentioned in the above letter. iii). Information gathered revealed that the revenues reco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

However, he did not dwell on the nature of the information in his possession to assess whether the said information gave rise to a reason to believe. He also failed to seek clarification regarding the information that gathered during the assessment giving rise to his reason to believe. This gives to conclusion that the said information is either not present or it was not gathered at all. Finally the penultimate test of validity of the reason to reopen, resulting in addition or adjustment to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as not reached a finality nor the charges filed against SCSL had indicated any irregularities in subsidiaries of SCSL. In the above circumstances, what is stated in the letter and statement do not give rise rational reason to reopen the appellant's case. 22. The Ld. Counsel submitted the notice under Sec.148 was issued based on vague reasons and there was no tangible or definite information which could lead to the formation of belief that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. In t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

end of the assessment year. The case falls under Sec.149( 1 )(b), the prerequisite for applying this section being that income of Rs.One Lakh or more should have escaped assessment. The reasons recorded by the A.O have not pinpointed as to which transaction(s) or events have resulted in underassessment of income of Rs.One Lakh or more. In this connection we rely on the undermentioned decisions for the proposition that where the Assessing Officer has not pinpointed the escapement of income of Rs. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ny had escaped. None of the reasons recorded by the AO indicates a lead for further inquiry to an area or group of transactions of the appellant Company. It is most important to appreciate at this juncture the routine enquiry carried out by the AO as if i is assessment under section 143(3). He did not refer to the "information gathered" which was recorded as the reason for any further enquiry during the assessment process. Neither the enquiry nor the additions made had any nexus or lin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ve a rational connection with the belief. The material in possession of the AO should have a direct nexus to the said belief. The material should be adequate enough to make the AO believe possible escapement of income. The test of rational connection fails where there is no material or the material gives rise only a suspicion not leading to belief. The material should not be vague or guess or gossip or rumor. The reason cited by the AO cannot be pretence to reopen the assessment. It cannot be pu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ann.com 74 Delhi) • CIT vs. Mohd. Juned Dadani (30 Taxmann.com I. Guj.) 27. We heard both the parties. In a recent case the Hyderabad bench of the Tribunal in the case of Rohini Boitecb (P) Ltd and other, ITA No.1233/Hyd/2011 and other appeals jointly disposed vide order dated 31.12.2013, the issue of Section 147, especially in light of Satyam scam was examined. In these sixteen appeals also, assessments were reopened on sole ground that these companies are Sat yam's group companies and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

me and also since the assessment has been reopened beyond the period of 4 years when there is no failure on the part of the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts in the original assessment itself, and there being, no tangible material 'for the reopening of the assessment, the CIT(A) erred in confirming the order of the Assessing Officer. We, therefore, hold that the reopening of the jurisdiction under Section 147 is bad in law ad is to be quashed. 28. With respect to the re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version