TMI Blog2014 (11) TMI 995X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n this appeal has been answered against the assessee by a decision of the Supreme Court in Maruti Suzuki Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise, (2009 (8) TMI 14 - SUPREME COURT), except with regard to the levy of penalty, which the Supreme Court held is not leviable. - Decided partly in favour of Revenue. - C.M.A. No. 1478 of 2007 - - - Dated:- 6-11-2014 - R. Sudhakar and R. Karuppiah, JJ. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... evy of penalty, which the Supreme Court held is not leviable. In view of the above, this appeal is partly allowed in terms of the decision in Maruti Suzuki Limited case, referred supra, and the order of the Tribunal dated 22-3-2006 made in Final Order Nos. 213 and 214 of 2006 is set aside to the extent indicated above, answering the substantial question of law in favour of the department. No co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
