2012 (7) TMI 886

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... unsel, for the Respondent. ORDER Issue notice. 2. Mr. Satish Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel accepts notice and submits that the petition can be disposed of at this stage. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 8-5-2012 of CESTAT directing that pre-depositing the entire duty and interest component. 4. Counsel for the petitioner contended that the Tribunal as well as the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ncial circumstances and the Tribunal ought not to have directed the petitioner to pay the entire amount of duty inclusive of interest. Learned counsel emphasised that the burden in this case becomes oppressive. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that Tribunal's order is well reasoned and does not call for any interference. He submitted that the findings of fact are concurrent and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X