Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s SB Engineers Versus Commissioner Of Central Excise & Customs Service Tax - Vadodara-ii

Cenvat Credit - Reversal in case of Job work availing Exemption under Notification No. 8/2005 dated 01.03.2005 - Rule 6 of Cenvat credit Rules 2004 - held that:- In various decision, it was observed that, Cenvat credit of input services was admissible to the job worker clearing goods to principal manufacturer under Notification Number 214/86-C.E. In view of the above, we hold that the provisions of Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 cannot be invoked for denying Cenvat credit of input se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

& S.T, VAPI are relevant - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. : ST/13758/2014-SM - ORDER No. A/11053/2015 - Dated:- 20-7-2015 - Mr. H.K. Thakur, J. For Appellant : S.R. Dixit, Advocate For Respondent : Shri J. Nagori, Authorised Representative Per : Mr. H.K. Thakur; This appeal has been filed by the appellant against OIA No. VAD-EXCUS-002-APP-378-14-15 dated 03.09.2014 under which first appellate authority upheld OIO dated 01.10.2013 passed by the adjudicating authority. 2. Shri S.R. D .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2014-TIOL-1800-CESTAT-AHM] (ii) JBF Industries vs. C.C.E, VAPI - [2014(34) S.T.R. 345 (Tri.- AHMD.)] 3. Shri J. Nagori (AR) appeared on behalf of the Revenue and strongly defended the order passed by the first appellate authority. 4. Heard both sides and perused the case records. The issue involved is whether appellant is required to pay an amount at the rate of 8% or 6% under Rule 6 of Cenvat credit Rules 2004 When goods/services rendered by a job worker are exempted. It has been correctly argu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

resent proceedings is whether the Cenvat credit of input services taken by the appellant and used by them in the manufacture of job-worked goods (exempt under Notification No. 214/86-C.E.) is admissible to the appellant or not in view of the provisions contained in Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The demand has been confirmed against the appellant on the grounds that Service Tax credit proportionate to the services used in the manufacture of exempted goods under Notification No. 214/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

law laid down by CESTAT in the case of Jindal Polymers [2001(43) RLT 680 (Tri.-Del) = 2001 (135) E.L.T. 657 (Tri.-Del)]. We find that in the mater of Jindal Polymers (supra), a division of Jindal Polyester Ltd., were engaged in the manufacture of polyester/polymer chips falling under Chapter 39 on job work basis or Jindal Polyester Ltd. They received main inputs viz. DMT and MEG from Jindal Polyester Ltd. for the purpose of processing/job work in terms of Notification 214/86-C.E., dated 25.03.19 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ovat credit of duty paid on inputs used in the manufacture of final products cleared at nil rate of duty is not admissible if the provisions of Rule 57CC ibid are not followed. Following the ratio of Bajaj Tempo Case [1994 (69) E.L.T. 122], the Tribunal held in this case that the appellants were entitled to Modvat credit of duty paid on inputs procured on their own account & used in the manufacture of job-worked goods exempted under Notification Number 214/86-C.E. This decision of the Tribun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r No. A/497-498/WBZ/AHD/2010, dated 13.05.2010), The Tribunal has held that Cenvat credit of input services was admissible to the job worker clearing goods to principal manufacturer under Notification Number 214/86-C.E. In view of the above, we hold that the provisions of Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 cannot be invoked for denying Cenvat credit of input services used by the appellant factory for manufacture of job-worked goods under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. Though the Larger Ben .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Update Alerts     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version