TMI Blog2003 (12) TMI 626X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ismissed order of the High Court without assigning reasons therefor does not meet the requirements of law. 2. Respondent (hereinafter referred to as the accused ) faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 18 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short the Act ). Prosecution version was that on 26-4-1995 accused was found in illicit possession of a large quantity of opium weighing one kilogram which was being carried in a bag. The officer who apprehended the accused informed him that if he wanted the bag to be searched in the presence of a gazetted officer of police or a magistrate, he could indicate his choice. The accused however reposed confidence on the Sub-Inspector of Police ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ublic Prosecutor to present an appeal to the High Court from an original or appellate order of acquittal passed by any Court other than a High Court or an order of acquittal passed by the Court of Session in revision. (3) No appeal under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be entertained except with the leave of the High Court. 5. The trial Court was required to carefully appraise the entire evidence and then come to a conclusion. If the trial Court was at lapse in this regard the High Court was obliged to undertake such an exercise by entertaining the appeal. The trial Court on the facts of this case did not perform its duties, as was enjoined on it by law. The High Court ought to have in such circumstances granted leave and th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... judicially recognized as imperative. The view was reiterated in Jawahar Lal Singh v. Naresh Singh and Ors. [(1987) 2 SCC 222]. Judicial discipline to abide by declaration of law by this Court, cannot be forsaken, under any pretext by any authority or Court, be it even the Highest Court in a State, oblivious to Article 141 of the Constitution of India, 1950 (in short the Constitution ). 6. Even in respect of administrative orders Lord Denning M.R. in Breen v. Amalgamated Engineering Union [1971 (1) All E.R. 1148] observed The giving of reasons is one of the fundamentals of good administration . In Alexander Machinery (Dudley) Ltd. v. Crabtree [1974 LCR 120] it was observed: Failure to give reasons amounts to denial of justice . Reasons ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
