TMI Blog2015 (9) TMI 35X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re undertaken by TGBL. Appellant will be interested to get rebate claim of the duty paid on 20.09.1997 before the returned goods were allowed to be cleared under Rule 173 H of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules 1944, on the documents relating to export of goods. Rule 173 L of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 can be followed only by the manufacture/re-manufacture of the goods and not by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oner : Shri S. J. Vyas, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Govind Jha, AR ORDER Per: H.K. Thakur This appeal has been filed by the appellant with respect to OIA No. Commr(A)/13/VDR-I/2004 dated 23.01.2004 passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Vadodara as first appellate authority. Under this OIA dated 23.01.2004 first appellate authority has rejected the claim of the appellant by ho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . 281 dated 20.09.1997). That between 20.09.1997 to 21.04.1998 goods were returned by TGBL under Rule 173H and repacked for final export by the appellant. It is the case of the learned advocate that Rule 173 L refund claim has to be filed only by the re-manufacture of the goods returned and not by the merchant exporter. It was his case that their case was rebate of duty claimed by the merchant exp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ter and not a person who undertook first manufacture and subsequent processing of the returned goods. Appellant is not concerned as to what activities are undertaken by TGBL. Appellant will be interested to get rebate claim of the duty paid on 20.09.1997 before the returned goods were allowed to be cleared under Rule 173 H of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules 1944, on the documents relating to ex ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
