2015 (9) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eputy Advocate-General, Haryana, for respondents. JUDGMENT Dismissed as withdrawn. VATAPNo. 128 of 2013 2.  This order shall dispose of VATAPNos. 128 and 129 of 2013 as learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the issue involved herein is identical. However, the facts have been extracted from VATAPNo. 128 of 2013. 3.  VATAPNo. 128 of 2013 has been preferred by the appellant-a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... given by the Department. The transactions cannot remain out of books of account. The appellant is filing returns and discharging tax obligations in accordance therewith and claiming input tax on the basis of the said invoices. During the assessment year 2006-07, the assessment was framed ex parte on March 15, 2010, annexure A1. The appellant could not appear and produce record so as to claim the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ventuality the liability of the dealer is to be re-determined. 7.  The learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the issue raised in these appeals is no longer res integra and stands concluded by the decisions of this court in CWP No. 13789 of 2011 titled as Vijay Cottex Ltd., Panipat v. State of Haryana [2014] 71 VST 197 (P&H) and CWP No. 15553 of 2011 titled as Jai Hanuman Stone Cru .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X