Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Tulip International Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward-33 (3) , Kolkata

Undisclosed Receipts - assessee submitted that the income arising out of the entire receipts could not be taxed and prayed that the matter be restored to the file of AO for verifying the bank accounts and determine the net profit in the hands of assessee - Held that:- We find that the Bank accounts, in which the impugned amounts were deposited, have not been examined by the lower authorities. We are in agreement with the plea of the ld. counsel for the assessee that the entire receipt s cannot b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y conclusion, these three bank accounts in which the amount s have been deposited, are examined by the Assessing Officer to arrive at proper conclusion. We, accordingly, set aside the order of ld. CIT(Appeals) and restore the matter back to the file of Assessing Officer for verification of Bank accounts to determine the income arising from the receipts credited in the impugned Bank ac counts. - Decided in favour of assessee for statistical purposes. - I. T. A. No. 369/KOL/ 2015 - Dated:- 13-8-20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

exporters. It had filed it s return of income declaring loss of ₹ 85,578/-. The assessee had claimed credit of TDS of ₹ 2,369/-. From the Profit & Loss Account, the Assessing Officer noticed that the total turnover of the business of the firm for the financial year 2009-10 was ₹ 12,74,780/-, which included commission of ₹ 14,500/-, gross bill of ₹ 10,68,364/-, service charges of ₹ 1,40,700/- and service tax of ₹ 51,216/-. From the 26AS statement for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

received during the year under consideration in its return. Notices under section 133(6) were issued to different parties and they confirmed the transactions and TDS deducted thereon. The Assessing Officer further noticed that Bank accounts were opened using the PAN of the fi rm (AABFT9009R) with Saraswat Cooperative Bank, Camac Bhunder branch at Mumbai bearing Account No. 143100100000165 and Union Bank of India, Bhat Bazar Branch, Mumbai bearing Account No. 315901010036770 and all the transact .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

get the account opened. The Assessing Officer issued show-cause notice under section 133(6) to Mr. Chetwani, who in his reply dated 13.10.2012, clearly stated as under:- I am not partner or Proprietor of this Company. I am only working of above company. I do not know anything about of this account of this company. I am only doing the job of outfield staff. Company boss was Mr. Basant Basu. You have any query you can ask Mr. Basant Basu . 3. The representative of Mr. Manish Kishorilal Chatwani, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

66,805/- and ₹ 1,19,218/- on account of Mcleod Russel India Limited totalling to ₹ 1,86,023/-. 4. Before the ld. CIT(Appeals), the assessee primarily contested the addition being made in its hand, though the accounts were in the name of Mr. Manish Chatwani. The ld. CIT(Appeals) dismissed the assessee s appeal. 5. Being aggrieved with the order of ld. CIT(Appeals), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal on the following effective grounds of appeal:- l. For that the Appellate O .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is wrong in confirming the undisclosed receipt of ₹ 2,31,54,644 excluding the sum of ₹ 1,04,503.00 as income on the basis of appearing in Form No.26AS . Statement for the year under consideration without going through the documents which is unwarranted and against the facts of the case whereas your Appellant submitted all the document s but the Appellate Authority did not give any confrontation for any clarification. 4. For that the Learned Appellate Authority admitted that the two .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s of ₹ 2,31,54,644.00. Shri Manish Kishorlal Chatwani admitted that he acted and carried out the business without knowledge of Appellant and in this respect, a written submission signed by Shri Manish K Chatawani was submitted before the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-9 and whereas the Appellate authority did not consider while passing the Appellate Order which is unwarranted and against the facts of the case. 5. For that the Learned Appellate Authority should have considered .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the receipts in Mumbai jurisdiction are the fruits of his effort and the income arising out of the same receipts are absolutely his income and should be taxed in his hands. Any penalty or interest or other penal provisions of the Income Tax Act shall be the responsibility of Shri Manish K Chatani. The Photocopy of the said documents were produced before the Appellate Authority but the Appellate Authority did not consider them. The Appellate Authority confirmed the undisclosed receipt of  .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee has al so taken the following additional ground of appeal:- 1. For that, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the addition of ₹ 2,31,54,644/- by the Asse ssing Officer do not belong to the appellant and the same should be added in the hands of Mr. Manish K. Chatwani who is assessed by the Income-tax Officer, Ward 22(3) -2, Mumbai in view of the evidences produced by the Appellant. 2. For that, on the facts of the case, even assuming but not admitting that the turnover re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

half of the Appellant before your honour. 7. ld. counsel for the assessee has effectively pressed Ground No. 2 of the additional ground. At the time of hearing before us, ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that, in any view of the matter, the income arising out of the ent ire receipts could not be taxed and prayed that the matter be restored to the file of Assessing Officer for verifying the bank account s and determine the net profit in the hands of assessee. 8. Ld. D. R. for the Revenue re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

records. In this case, the Tribunal had granted stay of demand vide its order dated 15.05.2015 in S. P. No 17/Kol/2015 by observing as under:- The assessee in his petition has referred to this fact in para 14, which reads as under: 14. Your petitioner states that the Learned Appellate Authority admitted that the two bank accounts were opened with Saraswat Co-operative Bank, Camac Bhunder Branch at Mumbai vide Account No. 143100100000165 and the Union Bank of India, Bhat Bazar Branch, Mumbai vide .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion signed by Shri Manish K Chatawani was submitted before the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-9 and whereas the Appellate authority did not consider while passing the Appellate Order which is unwarranted and against the facts of the case. 3. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee also referred to the affidavit of Shri Manish K. Chatwani placed in assessee s paper book at page 47 wherein, according to ld. Counsel for the assessee admitted that this amount belongs to him. The copy of affida .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e admits this amount belongs to him or not and send the report to the Tribunal within a month s time from the date of receipt of this order . 10. In the affidavit filed by Shri Manish K. Chetwani, contained in page 47 of the paper book, para 3 refers as under:- I Manish Chetwani state that during the financial year 2009-10 I have operated three bank ac counts on behal f of the firm without intimating the partner of fi rm on the strength of power of attorney given by the partner of the firm. Bank .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version